Printable View
I would go with the Redline, Same as the STI with better performance across the board. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by V1DUDE
this is the reason why iam thinking about selling my v1 and buying the sti driver. IT seems to do really good, althought there is really no Q/T here in IL, and I raley see I/0. I see more moving isntant on then stationary. Will see, I am really intersed in the STI Driver.Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebird
Redline looks to like it will certainly be a big player for the top shelf. Nice to see how the STI and the V1 has matured.Quote:
Originally Posted by ObsidianTrue ... that's why a lot of people have high hopes for the Redline, me included. I am really hoping it is essentially an improved STI.Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebird
Too bad no change on the 9500 series, but I didn’t expect anything different ether.
^ Ah thats good ! :lol::lol::lol:Quote:
http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...cons/icon1.gif Re: GOL 2009 Radar WRAPPED UP!!!!!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by nine_c1 http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...s/viewpost.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacerX http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...s/viewpost.gif
For those who would like to get an idea of how the Redline would stack up in all of this, look at Roy's testing since he was using my 3.863 that was in this test.
The 3.863 had default settings when Roy had it.
And hell yeah, I run Ka guard off. Because I can. :)
i get very few falses from it, and besides, we all deal with k band falses, a few ka alerts don't mean squat, when i may be getting something that everything else could miss.
Oh, and for any whiners out there, at least the Belscorts were run in highway mode instead of the default auto mode.
I wanted to run everything stock factory settings, but got vetoed.
the belscorts filter out weak k band, so expect a loss of performance if you run it like that.
Oh, and now i have RDR off on my STI-r as well. :)
Where do you live..........in the desert ? :p
Yeah, and its still a 100 frickin degrees here. :)
I can't stop sniveling! :lol::lol::lol:
is it me or am i looking at the wrong. The cobra did better against 35.5 around the bend against valentine 3.864 and 3.863
We need more cobra radar testing. That cheap $100 cobra freakn owns compare to retail market price for the rx65,x50, and other radars that cost over 300. So what if it leaks and can trigger other radars to go off 2 miles around it's self. For 100 bones, it owns. I really want to see what a $300 cobra can do.
[quote=V1DUDE;611025]is it me or am i looking at the wrong. The cobra did better against 35.5 around the bend against valentine 3.864 and 3.863[/quote
Shhhhh, dont tell Jazzy]
Oh, the 9500ci really did fail considering the $1,600 price tag. Hope I can fleebay it and buy 3 more V1.
[quote=Freebird;611029]oh its too late, I gotta say Iam kinda of dissapointed in the V1 3.864. I mean even the M4 did better with 35.5, and that is what they used here. Oh boy time to make some very important decisionsQuote:
Originally Posted by V1DUDE
Honestly I am not a fan of the testing done with the KA-guard off.
Was there testing done with the V1 with the KA guard on and the KA guard off? I would like to know how much of a difference disabling this feature which most people would never do increased performance
Cobra has extreme tunnel vision !Quote:
Originally Posted by DrCoke