LI vs LRB
LI vs LRB
Snoop, we will be doing more testing. Everyone keep making suggestions.
Critique what we have done, ask questions.
Maybe one day we could get a nationwide experienced group testing meet together.
My job was filming the LI vs Blinder part of our meet and installing the Blinders. The real credit goes to the other members of the East Coast Countermeasures Testing Group, who scouted the site, organized the meet, decided on what we were testing, the excellent punch through master, and those who could interpret the results of the full meet. I am not mentioning their names here, since I didn't ask them if I could, but they are the ones who deserve the credit. Guys, take the credit.
Last edited by yellowcab; 03-14-2011 at 09:57 PM.
LI vs. Prolite+
This is the final video for the series.
Last edited by yellowcab; 03-14-2011 at 10:06 PM. Reason: added text
Awesome thread! I can hardly wait to see more.
So the BLINDER performed somewhat better than the LI against the stalker -- "In this Test".. -- Just shows how biased tests can be made up as there are always inconsistencies.
It would take a lot of time but It would be good to do a few runs at least with a controlled scenario and then work out an average % of overall protection offered by that Jammer for that setup arrangement. Yet again everyone installs differently on different cars so the results will be different again.
On your next test it would be good to see the jammers performance when installed slightly incorrectly (which does occur) or too low, or either side of the license plate like how most people choose to install them even though not recommended
Thanks guys great stuff!
Nice vids!!!!!! Yellowcab should be a sports announcer, lol.
ECCTG ftw
Should have tried a test with both units turned on, just to see if there was any interference.
Fantastic work, guys. Can't wait to see more video.
It is important to note that this placement is literally the ultimate ideal for this car. I won't divulge the owner of the car unless they wish to speak up but they spent countless hours testing different setups and tweaking everything until finally reaching this end result. The Blinder heads are way to large to be mounted in this location permanently.
Yeah it seems the 100pps issue is fixed but now they need to look at the 125pps LRB lol
Good idea. We will note this for our next test.
Thanks Yellowcab. We all did this together and we wouldn't have been able to do what we did without everyone that attended. On top of that we had an awesome time. We have created a system/precedent that has only just begun to be used. Look for much more to develop as the summer months progress.
Good idea this will be tested in the future.
Thats the one. When I had my Blinder M47s it was like they weren't even on :O
Honestly you guys can't really appreciate this course until you see it in person. This is a very challenging real world course offering a shooting angle that is off axis in both the horizontal and vertical planes. As well as an initial dip that points the jammer heads downward. These are the types of shots that happen in the real world. This is no bull**** straight line course. Any jammer worth a damn that is properly installed should get JTG on a straight flat course, but thats not what happens in real life so stop testing that way!! ECCTG does it right. I don't care what jammer you have, even HP LIs, I will get some kind of PT on you here. In order to survive off axis encounters like these, jammer heads need to be placed in a way that allows the beam more spread. Having your heads near the center of the car works great on a straight flat shot, but in real life expect to get owned.
Bookmarks