Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 82
  1. #31
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Driving in the left lane, 10 MPH below the PSL, with my turn signal on!
    Posts
    629

    Default Re: Laser interceptor 8.8 dual vs. Blinder m27 version 2.10 chapter 2

    LI vs LRB


  2. #32
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Driving in the left lane, 10 MPH below the PSL, with my turn signal on!
    Posts
    629

    Default Re: Laser interceptor 8.8 dual vs. Blinder m27 version 2.10 chapter 2

    Quote Originally Posted by snoopyc4 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by switch626 View Post
    In the real world you only need a few seconds to slow down and kill the jammer.
    #6 of the laser jammer FAQ:

    First, it is important to understand that a jammer does not buy you time. It buys you distance. It's about feet, not seconds. Some feel that any jammer that protects you down to around 500 feet is “good enough” to save you from a ticket because many cops do not engage you below 500 feet, so you have a few seconds to react. But others maintain that nothing but JTG is good enough to be sure of not receiving a ticket with laser. The rationale being that, in reality, most laser encounters take place right around 500 feet to begin with. And it is not the distance at which you are shot that you have to jam to. It is the distance at which you finally get slowed down that you have to jam to! If you are targeted at 500 feet while travelling at highway speed, you will travel past the officer before you can slow down. That means your jammer better still be protecting you the whole time, or you’re toast.
    http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...-glossary.html

    Very nice videos. Yellowcab, I think for the next round of testing, you guys should do some quick ambush style testing with both the LI and Blinder. Don't hit the jammer equipped vehicle until it is 500 ft or less away.
    Snoop, we will be doing more testing. Everyone keep making suggestions.

    Critique what we have done, ask questions.

    Maybe one day we could get a nationwide experienced group testing meet together.

    My job was filming the LI vs Blinder part of our meet and installing the Blinders. The real credit goes to the other members of the East Coast Countermeasures Testing Group, who scouted the site, organized the meet, decided on what we were testing, the excellent punch through master, and those who could interpret the results of the full meet. I am not mentioning their names here, since I didn't ask them if I could, but they are the ones who deserve the credit. Guys, take the credit.
    Last edited by yellowcab; 03-14-2011 at 09:57 PM.

  3. #33
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Driving in the left lane, 10 MPH below the PSL, with my turn signal on!
    Posts
    629

    Default Re: Laser interceptor 8.8 dual vs. Blinder m27 version 2.10 chapter 2

    LI vs. Prolite+



    This is the final video for the series.
    Last edited by yellowcab; 03-14-2011 at 10:06 PM. Reason: added text

  4. #34
    Professional
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Passing on the right
    Posts
    1,274

    Default Re: Laser interceptor 8.8 dual vs. Blinder m27 version 2.10 chapter 2

    Awesome thread! I can hardly wait to see more.

  5. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    94

    Default Re: Laser interceptor 8.8 dual vs. Blinder m27 version 2.10 chapter 2

    So the BLINDER performed somewhat better than the LI against the stalker -- "In this Test".. -- Just shows how biased tests can be made up as there are always inconsistencies.
    It would take a lot of time but It would be good to do a few runs at least with a controlled scenario and then work out an average % of overall protection offered by that Jammer for that setup arrangement. Yet again everyone installs differently on different cars so the results will be different again.
    On your next test it would be good to see the jammers performance when installed slightly incorrectly (which does occur) or too low, or either side of the license plate like how most people choose to install them even though not recommended

    Thanks guys great stuff!

  6. #36
    Power User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,054

    Default Re: Laser interceptor 8.8 dual vs. Blinder m27 version 2.10 chapter 2

    Nice vids!!!!!! Yellowcab should be a sports announcer, lol.


    ECCTG ftw

  7. #37
    Power User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,889

    Default Re: Laser interceptor 8.8 dual vs. Blinder m27 version 2.10 chapter 2

    Should have tried a test with both units turned on, just to see if there was any interference.

  8. #38
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    State of Awareness
    Posts
    718

    Default Re: Laser interceptor 8.8 dual vs. Blinder m27 version 2.10 chapter 2

    Fantastic work, guys. Can't wait to see more video.

  9. #39
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,789

    Default Re: Laser interceptor 8.8 dual vs. Blinder m27 version 2.10 chapter 2

    Quote Originally Posted by yellowcab View Post
    My new name for this Stalker LZ1 is Darth Vader

    The Stalker LZ1 vs Laser Interceptor gen 8.8

    that must be robs evil stalker.

  10. #40
    Professional
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Your imagination
    Posts
    1,153

    Default Re: Laser interceptor 8.8 dual vs. Blinder m27 version 2.10 chapter 2

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunter View Post
    good videos.Blinders can be good but the placements have to be very well.
    It is important to note that this placement is literally the ultimate ideal for this car. I won't divulge the owner of the car unless they wish to speak up but they spent countless hours testing different setups and tweaking everything until finally reaching this end result. The Blinder heads are way to large to be mounted in this location permanently.

    Quote Originally Posted by that guy View Post
    blinder needs a new algorithm for the LRB
    Yeah it seems the 100pps issue is fixed but now they need to look at the 125pps LRB lol


    Quote Originally Posted by snoopyc4 View Post
    Very nice videos. Yellowcab, I think for the next round of testing, you guys should do some quick ambush style testing with both the LI and Blinder. Don't hit the jammer equipped vehicle until it is 500 ft or less away.
    Good idea. We will note this for our next test.

    Quote Originally Posted by yellowcab View Post
    Snoop, we will be doing more testing. Everyone keep making suggestions.

    Critique what we have done, ask questions.

    Maybe one day we could get a nationwide experienced group testing meet together.

    My job was filming the LI vs Blinder part of our meet and installing the Blinders. The real credit goes to the other members of the East Coast Countermeasures Testing Group, who scouted the site, organized the meet, decided on what we were testing, the excellent punch through master, and those who could interpret the results of the full meet. I am not mentioning their names here, since I didn't ask them if I could, but they are the ones who deserve the credit. Guys, take the credit.
    Thanks Yellowcab. We all did this together and we wouldn't have been able to do what we did without everyone that attended. On top of that we had an awesome time. We have created a system/precedent that has only just begun to be used. Look for much more to develop as the summer months progress.

    Quote Originally Posted by protias View Post
    Should have tried a test with both units turned on, just to see if there was any interference.
    Good idea this will be tested in the future.

    Quote Originally Posted by upstatedoc View Post

    that must be robs evil stalker.
    Thats the one. When I had my Blinder M47s it was like they weren't even on :O


    Honestly you guys can't really appreciate this course until you see it in person. This is a very challenging real world course offering a shooting angle that is off axis in both the horizontal and vertical planes. As well as an initial dip that points the jammer heads downward. These are the types of shots that happen in the real world. This is no bull**** straight line course. Any jammer worth a damn that is properly installed should get JTG on a straight flat course, but thats not what happens in real life so stop testing that way!! ECCTG does it right. I don't care what jammer you have, even HP LIs, I will get some kind of PT on you here. In order to survive off axis encounters like these, jammer heads need to be placed in a way that allows the beam more spread. Having your heads near the center of the car works great on a straight flat shot, but in real life expect to get owned.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Laser interceptor dual verse lti truspeed jtg
    By BMW-NJ in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-16-2011, 05:38 AM
  2. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-04-2010, 06:00 PM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-08-2010, 01:34 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •