1) Tupac ShakurQuote:
Originally Posted by IRCMUSA
2) We felt like it
Printable View
1) Tupac ShakurQuote:
Originally Posted by IRCMUSA
2) We felt like it
jerry,Quote:
Originally Posted by jerry540i
knock it off about the 9/11 thing ive heard you blabbing about it too much if he thinks that it is his God given right.
You would be supprized about the number of people that think its true.
There is way too much evidence that supports it.
So until you have hard proof evidence otherwise, or there is no such thing as Big Foot
Watch some movies educate yourself.
or live in your everyday 8-5 M-F bubble.
the world is ok George W and America loves you, you wonderful tax paying SS number of a life form.
OK i feel yaQuote:
Originally Posted by happya$$
Yea, I remember the whole 2 diode deal. But hey, w/e it seems to be working great, and the price is right. :)
Tupac, it seems that you will not be satisfied until GOL & Ivan & Elvis all say that they are in business together and that the LI is a rebadged blinder.
noorudenshakur, I am new to laser stuff and just getting more info and knowledge about it. I understand some of your concerns. However, I do question some of your claims such statements asandQuote:
Elvis being a forum admin and LI USA exclusive dealer begins spamming people by PM with ordering details and creating a waiting list for when the product came to the USA.
When I say spam I mean he pm’s everyone.
If Elvis did spam members about LI, i would have gotten one. I also wondered how you came to that conclusion without having the facts. To me, it would be more on a suspicion unless otherwise proven. How often do we make errors just because of suspicion? Many times including my self. Making conclusions out of suspicion is clearly offensive to others specially when there is no proof and most specially when the person involve is not doing what your suspicion tells you.Quote:
Elvis also keeps the pot stirring in the public forum posting a massive amount of LI stuff that keeps the fire burning hot and forum interest for LI high.
On the later quote that i did, there is some "possibility" that Elvis may have stirred some fire about LI. But more info's are coming out from other members like RacerX, CCC and others who have tested LI and compared it with LPP and AL that the LI works wonders. When members see the true outcome of the product, they get ecstatic and hyped up with the product.
No offense Noory. Just wondered how you came to your conclusions about the one's I pointed out.
Cheers.
Azone
*COUGH* drop it *COUGH*
From what i understand coming from Jim, CrazyVolvoRob, these were allllll spread out events that were stated on the forum, someone made tha comment in the other tread seek and ye shall find. Noory apparently just has a good memory I had totally forgotten about them till he brought it up.
Noory,
Although I do agree with certain aspects of both your previous thread as well as current post (i.e. that I do see preferential treatment [why this may be, though, should be debated separately] - NOTE: however, I don't see the conspiracy), there are a couple of factual points that I feel need to be addressed in this particular post:
Yes, I also remember that, nearly to-a-man, the LI was highly, highly regarded by the GOL.Quote:
Originally Posted by noorudeenshakur
However, and I think that this is *VERY* important, there were members, of which perhaps my fellow neighbor happya$$ was the most vocal and most consistent, who clearly and repeatedly highlighted and warned everyone that the testing of the LI was done with pre-production prototype units, and to recall the disappointment that surrounded the initial AL test and its subsequent release, which failed to translate favorably.
And when the LI-specific Conference was locked by Roy, happya$$ and details about the product's release sketchy - and the time-line kept being pushed back - it was also happya$$ who was most vocal in expressing his disappointment about the way the situation had evolved....even to the point of thinking and publicaly saying, as many non-GOL members like myself, that the LI seemed like it was just going to be another vaporware product.
It truly wasn't until the LI came back in production form (more on this one later) and was seen to have performed so well for so many individual, independent, hobbyists that the GOL started warming back up to it.
Did I receive PMs from Elvis at that time?Quote:
When I say spam I mean he pm’s everyone.
Yes, I did.
However, they were totally unrelated to the LI.
I did receive another PM from Elvis in the last month or so, but it was only a "touching base" message from him, and was not what I would consider, at all, a sales-call.
To the best of my recollection, any kind of sales-related issues that we took up with each other, later, were conducted over either private e-mail or over the telephone.
Although I cannot, of course, guaranty that others were not SPAMed, I do see an exception in your claim, above, even if I were the sole case.
I thought it was discussed at one point?Quote:
Once the LI was released I noticed that Its production version is significantly different from the one tested at GOL tests.
The prototype version had 2 laser diodes per head. One was mounted vertically, one was mounted horizontally.
The production model of the LI only had one diode per head, but no one, not Ivan, Elvis or even GOL has touched on this or though it worth mentioning.
I actually remember "talking" to several fellow car-enthusiasts about this change-over (as well as the "price hike") on several of the different car-enthusiast Forums on which I actively participate.
I honestly don't know.Quote:
How can the retail version perform as well as prototype if it’s a different jammer altogether and has half the jamming power than the prototype?
It cant.
Does It perform well?
It sure does sound like it and Im VERY happy to hear that.
Perhaps the production single-diode version wouldn't be able to protect a tractor rig or an RV as effectively as the pre-production test-version, but maybe it's a case of true overkill - that one diode per head, in a dual-head setup, provides effective JTG performance for most typical road-vehicles, including mid- to mid-large-sized SUVs (i.e. charles charlie charles's M-Class), and that the cost-to-performance ratio of such a dual-diode setup would not be market-feasible, and the performance "never seen" under true road-conditions?
[/i]