Printable View
I love the sound of the Stalker firing.
It only takes a few pulses coming back to get a distance reading. Not even my LI's will keep me from getting a distance reading.
While you call the MOAC madness it did do what it was supposed to do and find the weakness in your system. I really think you need to simulate an overpass shot and see how that performs.
Oh I agree. it really showed that a narrow cone of fire is bad for that course. I did my research on the LI's they are firing at 25deg so there is quite abit more play in that setup.Quote:
Originally Posted by category4
I have some bar magnifiers on order I will be mounting in front of my main arrays to open up my angles. then I will retest. for a buck each if they work they will go on the man arrays horizontally and secondarys vertically
So overall from what you see there, am I going down the right path on my testing or am I making it way to hard on myself?. My goal right now is to make it unable to even get distance readings anywhere on the front of the car like you see in portions of the video. Or is that a near impossible task that will make me pull my hair out.
It only takes one or two pulse to get a distance reading, so I don't think you will ever be able to jam a distance reading completely.
You are probly right, as it stands I get distance readings easily on the headlights, But I don't get Immediate PT till under 200 feet.Quote:
Originally Posted by category4
I am gong to have to get on the balcony of a friends house to test for overpass hits once I get the lenses on
New video of the jammer in use. better videos to follow . this is shooting down onto the car at an angle . my nice flat run had the landowners on it today )
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hak2Ckj4DTU]YouTube - output[/ame]
More room for improvement as the headlights need work.
great work man keep it up!!
Clearly on the right track. Excellent work! Very impressive! :thumb2:
I'm surprised it didn't trigger any jam codes...
After reading all of the most recent posts I have couple issues. (I had read all the way to the initial arguments about why you wouldn't be able to use LEDs over a month a go.)
1. Why does everyone use the same LEDs instead of mixing lower or higher values for better performance?
2. The only reason you aren't doing Laser Diodes is because of the price but you left out the price of the Blinder CPU you are using to do the tests. What for? That is no where near $50 worth of parts.
3. Do you think the IR based system would be better if it was active for example where the some of the heads tracked the incoming IR source not just stationary?
4. Do you think 8 laser diodes would be overkill for a front system?
5. If overpowering the gun is your preferred method (blinding) why don't you just make a strip that goes across the front of the car with say 80 IR LEDs? At some point won't the massive IR output prevent any external light from reaching its destination and reflecting? Don't most materials have a limit at which they stop reflecting?
6. I read something about you working on something like Veil. I want to try this but I am going to have to wait until I have access to a centrifuge. I am thinking I could use this info to make a coating that blocks all IR reflectivity that can be added to most car waxes or clear coats. It can also be applied to glass and plastics. What do you think?
I also learned about the electrical resistance caused by IR light in another patent. It would be cool to have abase coat that absorbed the IR or that could be modified by applying power like with an a LCD.
INFRARED SHIELDING FILTER - Patent application - with high heat resistance and transparency realizing an enhanced infrared shielding effect
Method and apparatus for measuring light reflectance absorption and or transmission - Patent 3910701
Very impressive, I am going to keep an eye out to see what happens with this.