Attorney Takes on Red Light Cameras

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by YTCD

He's an attorney he doesn't have to pay somebody and has plenty of time. No matter what if they reverse it's because of corrupt gov. Obviously it's been beaten but they make some dumb excuse that they were able to get away with before total bs

---

No $hit. If we were sitting out in a van with a digital camera at an intersection trying to police a neighborhood and being paid by neighborhood residents to give sworn testimony to officers who then issued summons to cars running redlights, we'd get our pants sued off for doing PI work without a license, but Corporate america will just get a slap on it's wrists.

I wonder if this PI defense will work on toll roads too :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lucky225

I wonder if this PI defense will work on toll roads too :P

---

Yeah it might, but the ones around here are goverment funded and managed I think.

We use Ezpass though??!?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by YTCD

Yeah it might, but the ones around here are goverment funded and managed I think.

We use Ezpass though??!?

---

Hrmm Texas has that TxTag thing I think which I believe you're correct is managed by TxDOT.. but in Cali I believe it's EzPass and FasTrak. I got a FasTrak ticket on the 91 express lane, ironically when I was working for a PI firm, that would have been funny to fight.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lucky225

Hrmm Texas has that TxTag thing I think which I believe you're correct is managed by TxDOT.. but in Cali I believe it's EzPass and FasTrak. I got a FasTrak ticket on the 91 express lane, ironically when I was working for a PI firm, that would have been funny to fight.

---

We can run them all the time we just get a 15 dollar bill in the mail. Which we never pay. NC has it nice enough that Im actually willing to pay it. Its 2.00 fine the same as what you have to usually pay.

:mad:

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/psb/Red...eraSystems.pdf

Who does DPS think they are to claim that the municipalities are the ones "operating" the cameras when they CONTRACT IT OUT. Shouldn't the CONTRACTORS be licensed as PI Licensing requires a high ethics standards, something REDFLEX certainly doesn't have, and the entire point of PI licensing. Yes Tx Transp Code AUTHORIZES Red light camera systems, but is it not the intent of the legislature that the people WHO it is contracted out to obey the law.

Ugh.. I want to see the Attorney General's opinion, not some agency who doesn't give a f*.

It sounds like someone paid the judge a visit and explained him how much money the towns will loose and probably include funds to pay him salary. Wonder if the judge is elected or appointed to his position.

If he is elected, sound like time for his voter to stand up and say he might be voted out if he over turns his ruling.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Maestro

It sounds like someone paid the judge a visit and explained him how much money the towns will loose and probably include funds to pay him salary. Wonder if the judge is elected or appointed to his position.

If he is elected, sound like time for his voter to stand up and say he might be voted out if he over turns his ruling.

---

This was a state agencies OPINION, not a courts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lucky225

This was a state agencies OPINION, not a courts.

---

I was not responding your posting but an earlier one that said the judge was going to review his previous ruling on the 17th of Dec to determine whether he missed ruled in this case.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Maestro

I was not responding your posting but an earlier one that said the judge was going to review his previous ruling on the 17th of Dec to determine whether he missed ruled in this case.

---

grrrr...

J.A.I.L.

:P