Round Two LTI Marksman vs. Antilaser G8 Dual
We tried another round of testing yesterday with the Grand Marquis with similar results from 2000FT to 0 FT. JTG every time. I forgot to mention in yesterdays post that most of the test runs we performed were at 35MPH, so it was easy to focus on points and pan since it gave us a good thirty plus seconds per run to find the “magic spot”. We never found one. We worked the corners of the fenders, the roofline, the side view mirrors etc.
We then marked off two separate distances. 500FT to 0 FT.,then 250 FT. to 0 FT. to test the short engagement theory. The results were as follows:
Center Mass 500FT to 0 FT.
Run#1 JTG Run #2 JTG Run #3 JTG
Driver’s side headlight:
Run#1 JTG Run #2 JTG Run #3 JTG
Center Mass 250FT to 0FT.
Run#1 JTG Run #2 JTG Run #3 JTG
Driver’s side headlight:
Run#1 JTG Run #2 JTG Run #3 JTG
It made no difference in targeting distance. By this point I was actually bored. We tried a few more short-term engagements around corners with JTG every time.
Now I’m interested in trying out the Stalker LZ1 or an LTI Ultralyte to see if it makes any difference since these are the guns used in Connecticut. I know that the Marksman is a 125pps gun and should produce “similar” results as the Ultralyte but the real question is will it??
The GOL test results were different with the two different guns. The Escort Shifter had very different results with the two guns. What do you guys think? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated :D
