V1 34.7 and 35.5 KA?

Ok, I've been reading a ton on here bacause i'm getting ready to step up to something new....Thinking V1....but i have a question.

Everyone keeps saying how the V1 is a bit lacking on 34.7 and 35.5 KA especially on off axis shots.......these are what i encounter mostly.....and laser now and then as well....but my question would a V1 be better at 34.7 and 35.5 KA then my 3 year old RX65??

I would think so...but i'd hate to get a V1 and have the same performance as what i already have.

I know the GOL results will be out soon as well but i'm pulling my hair out waiting for those so to keep me occupied i'm asking for your input on this...

any input would be great....Thanks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Grimmjpr

Ok, I've been reading a ton on here bacause i'm getting ready to step up to something new....Thinking V1....but i have a question.

Everyone keeps saying how the V1 is a bit lacking on 34.7 and 35.5 KA especially on off axis shots.......these are what i encounter mostly.....and laser now and then as well....but my question would a V1 be better at 34.7 and 35.5 KA then my 3 year old RX65??

I would think so...but i'd hate to get a V1 and have the same performance as what i already have.

I know the GOL results will be out soon as well but i'm pulling my hair out waiting for those so to keep me occupied i'm asking for your input on this...

any input would be great....Thanks

---

The only weakness with the V1 in the last round of off-axis testing was against 35.5. Against anything else, yes it will be better. Do you know if your RX65 is S7 or M4?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dpatel01

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Grimmjpr

Ok, I've been reading a ton on here bacause i'm getting ready to step up to something new....Thinking V1....but i have a question.

Everyone keeps saying how the V1 is a bit lacking on 34.7 and 35.5 KA especially on off axis shots.......these are what i encounter mostly.....and laser now and then as well....but my question would a V1 be better at 34.7 and 35.5 KA then my 3 year old RX65??

I would think so...but i'd hate to get a V1 and have the same performance as what i already have.

I know the GOL results will be out soon as well but i'm pulling my hair out waiting for those so to keep me occupied i'm asking for your input on this...

any input would be great....Thanks

---

The only weakness with the V1 in the last round of off-axis testing was against 35.5. Against anything else, yes it will be better. Do you know if your RX65 is S7 or M4?

---

Its an M4 Version 6.1 i think

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Grimmjpr

I would think so...but i'd hate to get a V1 and have the same performance as what i already have.

---

Trust me, the V1 will outperform your current radar detector in every category. Plus, with the V1 you will know where a radar signal is coming from thanks to the V1's arrows.

Cant go wrong with a Valentine IMHO:rock:

Valentine One Report Card


GOL Radar Detector Test - August 2005

Winner of X band detection test
Winner of K band detection test
Winner of 35.5 Ka band detection test (tie)
Winner of Ka Band 67ms POP detection test
Winner of K Band 16ms POP detection test
No Ku band detection test was done


GOL Radar Detector Test - January 2006

Winner of X band detection test
Winner of K band detection test
Winner of 34.7 Ka band detection test
Winner of Ku band detection test
No POP detection test was done


GOL Radar Detector Test - October 2006

No X band detection test was done
Winner of K band detection test
Winner of 33.8 Ka band detection test
Winner of 35.5 Ka band detection test
67ms Ka band POP over the hill detection test was done but no detector
alerted
No Ku band detection test was done


GOL Radar Detector Test - March 2007

Winner of X band detection test
Winner of K band detection test
Winner of 33.8 Ka band detection test
Winner of 35.5 Ka band detection test (SR7 was not mounted under the bumper or inside the grill as stated in installation manual)
Winner of Ku band detection test
Winner of 67ms POP detection test (K band POP and Ka band POP combined)


GOL Off-Axis Radar Detector Test - July 2007

Winner of 33.8 Ka band 0 degree detection test
Winner of 33.8 Ka band 15 degree detection test
Winner of 33.8 Ka band 30 degree detection test
Winner of 33.8 Ka band 45 degree detection test
Winner of 34.7 Ka band 0 degree detection test
Winner of 34.7 Ka band 15 degree detection test
Runner-up 34.7 Ka band 30 degree detection test
Runner-up 34.7 Ka band 45 degree detection test
Winner of 35.5 Ka band 0 degree detection test
Runner-up 35.5 Ka band 30 degree detection test
Winner of K band 0 degree detection test
Winner of K band 15 degree detection test
Winner of K band 30 degree detection test
Winner of K band 45 degree detection test


GOL Radar Detector Test - August 2007

No X band detection test was done
Winner of around the curve K band detection test
Winner of forward facing K band detection test
Winner of 33.8 Ka band detection test
Winner of 34.7 Ka band detection test
Winner of around the curve 34.7 Ka band detection test
Winner of 35.5 Ka band detection test
Winner of forward facing 35.5 Ka band detection test
All four of the Valentine One radar detectors alerted to instant-on 35.5 Ka band radar 100% of the time one mile away from the radar gun.
No Ku band detection test was done


VeilGuy's Laser Detection Test - February 2006

Winner of laser detection using four different lidar guns

"That being stated, these results suggest that, especially in close-range laser encounters, the Valentine 1 is the top performing laser detector, by a wide-margin...

As good as the other three leading detectors are in their ability to see laser, Valentine Research has really achieved a level of performance that is simply remarkable."

http://www.laserveil.com/laser/detectors/performance/


VeilGuy's Laser Detection Test - July 2009

Winner of laser detection using five different lidar guns (tie)

"Of course, the Valentine remains the champ in laser detection by far and even though the Beltronics STi-R and Escort Passport 9500ci/ZR4 (a laser jammer also) turned in similar detection results, they did it with either multiple heads/transponders or were located more closely to the preferred targeting areas, as they are custom-installed remotes."

http://www.laserveil.com/laser/detectors/reviews-tests-2009/

Thanks....I didn't realize that the V1 was soooooo much better at laser detection then everything else...that is really important...i know its a long shot still but jammers are illeagal here so the V1 would be better then my RX way better

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Grimmjpr

Thanks....I didn't realize that the V1 was soooooo much better at laser detection then everything else...that is really important...i know its a long shot still but jammers are illeagal here so the V1 would be better then my RX way better

---

Actually, laser detection doesn't really matter. Getting a laser alert means you got a ticket. I would look into getting a laser jammer even though they are illegal in your area. There are plenty of people on this forum who use jammers where they are illegal. If you practice the right jamming techniques, you will not be caught with a laser jammer.

Problem is on my Jeep the jammer heads would stick out like a sore thumb and i'd rather not risk it....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Grimmjpr

Problem is on my Jeep the jammer heads would stick out like a sore thumb and i'd rather not risk it....

---

Hate to say it but you'll have to drive the PSL then. A radar detector cannot provide adequate protection against police laser. The only sure defense against laser is a laser jammer.