What has longer/better range? PRO58 or a Vector 955?
Printable View
What has longer/better range? PRO58 or a Vector 955?
The Vector 955
This Bel model probably has a little better range, based off of tests with other Vector series models.Quote:
Originally Posted by NavySkCG52
The Vector 955 wasn't tested in this test, but the 995 was...and the results comparing the 995 to the Pro-58 are fairly close. Here are the results of the tests conducted by Radar Roy and Radarbusters.com comparing X, K, and Ka bands:
http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/9...rtestsx7hp.png
http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/3...rtestsk5fp.png
http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/8...rtestka9in.png
While the 995 had slightly better range, it was fairly close....closer than many people would believe. Another thing to remember is that the Whistler "supposedly" has better laser detection that the Bel models. All in all, it probably depends upon the price of the V955 compared to the Whistler Pro-58, and which is the better "value" for the price. Also, another thing to consider is whether the increased laser detection is worth an increased number of falses as well (which the Whistler supposedly has more of).
Wow, I'd much rather spend $100 dollars less and get a PRO58. Thank you SportsFan for the Info :)
Good choice!! :wink: :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Radar 4 Ever