SO, what is more effective against real police lidar. Blinder hp-905, or LI?

So I have been noticing that blinder has now finally released an HP model in a actual true diode set. My question is what is better the HP-905 from blinder, or the regular Laser interceptor. I am not going to compare the HP-905 to LI's HP model. This would be comparing apples to oranges as the HP LI has dual diodes, which is an unfair comparison. So, what jam's harder. The HP-905, or the LI? I have yet to see any test's by any major testing group on this subject. That includes GOL, SpeedmeasurmentLabs, etc.. Can anyone please bring me up to speed on this issue.

Thank you in advance in this regard in the boat for a new jammer and truly am at a loss on this one with no video's on you-tube documenting this jammer other than the seller's themselves. Which I don't look to for my info, as who knows if that is falsified? Independent people don't have cause to fabricate. Thank you in advance once more.


Alpine-

IMO, I would have to give the edge to the LI. Only because it has been the best jammer on the market for some time now. Blinder has always been very good, and now they have a high powered unit that can compete on the same terms with LI. However, until some quality definitive testing is done, I will have to default with LI.

Roy has some testing up on his site of the new blinder. Can't find the videos for the LI or ZR4 from that day.

Laser Ally jamming? Is this possible with the HP-905? I have seen no test's of this ever? Nor, claims of it occurring.


Alpine-

Also, I noticed blinder is not selling separate heads for the unit. This is a bit weird that you can not just purchase a replacement head, or an additional head to make a dual head unit a triple, or quad? Though LI offers this and has prices on their page.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by alpinestars_2002795

Also, I noticed blinder is not selling separate heads for the unit. This is a bit weird that you can not just purchase a replacement head, or an additional head to make a dual head unit a triple, or quad? Though LI offers this and has prices on their page.

---

already asked blinder and they will soon sell it in separate ...

Product is coming in today, parts and marketing material will be in the next order in a week.
There will be a single unit for bikes, smaller cars, it works! Tested on a SC-430
For the customer that wants to build there system on a budget.
Better performance, smaller, easier install locations, less money, the HP-905 has it hands down.
It's taken some time to get the system right, but were back!
Let the testing begin.

I would not recommend a single head front/rear for a car regardless of the jammers system.
Well,maybe a "smart" car.
Single head front/rear is fine for a bike.

blinderlaser on YouTube
Test results are one thing, HUD shots speak the truth.

This still does not answer any questions I asked. Can it jam Ally? No hud shot video's of that?


Alpine-

Still hasn't been tested in the wild so we will just have to wait and see

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by alpinestars_2002795

So I have been noticing that blinder has now finally released an HP model in a actual true diode set. My question is what is better the HP-905 from blinder, or the regular Laser interceptor. I am not going to compare the HP-905 to LI's HP model. This would be comparing apples to oranges as the HP LI has dual diodes, which is an unfair comparison. So, what jam's harder. The HP-905, or the LI? I have yet to see any test's by any major testing group on this subject. That includes GOL, SpeedmeasurmentLabs, etc.. Can anyone please bring me up to speed on this issue.

Thank you in advance in this regard in the boat for a new jammer and truly am at a loss on this one with no video's on you-tube documenting this jammer other than the seller's themselves. Which I don't look to for my info, as who knows if that is falsified? Independent people don't have cause to fabricate. Thank you in advance once more.


Alpine-

---