GOL help clear up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Toronto-radar-chopper

Pete at V1 said they are working to combat the spectre and after pushing him, said to check back in about 3 months on their website. V1 users, do you have to deal with this crap when you spend $400+++ on a RD and you have an issue or bug fix?

---

Spectre isn't an issue for most people. . and I'm sure its not really on their top priorities -I'm sure they are working on it - but performance should always be key. The check in 3 months could be a way to shut you up. How can they know in 3 months that it will be complete? Alot can be accomplished in 3 months, which means they aren't even close to getting it spectre free.

When I have a problem and call them, the times I've had a problem they've admitted that it A) was a problem and it was being worked on B) has been fixed and send unit in C) we've heard about the problem, but have been unable to reproduce the problem in the lab.

They might lie at points - but I always feel valued when I get done dealing with VR - hence why they have my business.

v1 has great performance all ready there is not much more to put into it except maybe work on 16ms k band PoP mode makeing the v1 more sent to detect this type of radar .stealth is where the v1 will go next.to you or to some stealth is not much of a deal but around the world alot of us need a 100% stealth v1 :) .

*****

Goals for v1:

1)Improve Pop detection for 16MS variety
2)Fix x ghosting issue on 3.861
3)Is the J bug still an issue? I'm not that familiar with it honestly.
4)Tech display (maybe this is only me). That would mean completely redesigning the actual RD though.
5)each band should have a different color LED for night reading ease.

I hate not knowing what frequency is being shot at me.

Your all right, I'm sure they get asked this all the time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MEM-TEK

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hookem202

Ok well im looking in the differences between the Rx-65 and STi. Anyways I know that the STi had problems with the 33.8 ka-band in march 2007 test. Anyways looking back i see in August 2006 that the STi had the same problem with 33.8 on the STRAIGHT LINE area and averaged around 151 ft, but in the OVER THE HILL TEST it averaged at 1573 ft.

Why is the over the hill have almost 10x the range?

---

Polarization of the Ka antenna within the STi is why. The polarization is more severe since the antennas within the STi are folded path designs which was necessary in order to fully shield output from the horns themselves.

---

If antenna polarization is the answer, then I must have missed the question somewhere.