Page 7 of 14 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 132

Thread: SML Day One

  1. #61
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Southern MA
    Posts
    10,127

    Default

    Seeing as SML detectors are provided by the company I wouldn't rush out to get them based on just hearing that the BEL STi tested had better audio ramp up....

    What version V1 was tested?

    Spoiler: show

    Radar Detectors-V1 & BEL v995
    Laser Jammer-Laser Interceptor Quad
    GPS Camera Locator-Cheetah C100
    GPS Nav-Garmin nuvi w/Trapster
    CB Radio-Galaxy DX-949 w/Wilson 500
    Scanner-RS Pro-96

  2. #62
    Founder of Stealthvation
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    11,174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazyVOLVOrob View Post
    Seeing as SML detectors are provided by the company I wouldn't rush out to get them based on just hearing that the BEL STi tested had better audio ramp up....

    What version V1 was tested?

    EXCELLENT point
    RIP Duncan my BELOVED black lab son 8/7/99-3/23/11. I will miss you DEARLY.


    http://www.criminalcustomzshop.com/


    LET THE BIRTH OF MANY TESTING GROUPS HAPPEN!











    You want to know what it is like doing something for the love and passion and not for the mighty dollar then look up GOL!










    buyradardetectors rocks!

  3. #63
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    7,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MEM-TEK View Post
    On the second night at SML Roy cooked us up two of his famous "Sturges" steaks and some baked potatoes. (Sturges is a big biker rally for those who don't know.)
    BS Alert!

    (I think you mean "Sturgis" )

  4. #64
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    7,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by happya$$ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by crazyVOLVOrob View Post
    Seeing as SML detectors are provided by the company I wouldn't rush out to get them based on just hearing that the BEL STi tested had better audio ramp up....

    What version V1 was tested?
    EXCELLENT point
    X2!

  5. #65
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Morristown, Arizona, United States
    Posts
    3,300

    Default

    Just posted a "teaser" of some of the videos that were taken this year at SML on my blog

    SML 2008 Review - Radar Detector Shoot Out
    RadarBusters.com
    Motorcycle Mounts and Accessories
    Also Join me at -
    Twitter: RadarRoy
    Facebook: Roy Reyer

  6. #66
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Morristown, Arizona, United States
    Posts
    3,300

    Default

    All I know on the V1, it was shipped just prior to the test and still had the shipping label on the box and was sealed.

    Quote Originally Posted by crazyVOLVOrob View Post
    Seeing as SML detectors are provided by the company I wouldn't rush out to get them based on just hearing that the BEL STi tested had better audio ramp up....

    What version V1 was tested?
    RadarBusters.com
    Motorcycle Mounts and Accessories
    Also Join me at -
    Twitter: RadarRoy
    Facebook: Roy Reyer

  7. #67
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Southern MA
    Posts
    10,127

    Default

    Glad to hear is sounds like they used a new V1

    Spoiler: show

    Radar Detectors-V1 & BEL v995
    Laser Jammer-Laser Interceptor Quad
    GPS Camera Locator-Cheetah C100
    GPS Nav-Garmin nuvi w/Trapster
    CB Radio-Galaxy DX-949 w/Wilson 500
    Scanner-RS Pro-96

  8. #68
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles Area
    Posts
    13,881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by radarroy View Post
    Just posted a "teaser" of some of the videos that were taken this year at SML on my blog

    SML 2008 Review - Radar Detector Shoot Out
    Tearing up some of these long established laser jammers? I'm thinking that if it's vertically polarized, that should make it more difficult to detect, but shouldn't make it any harder to jam. Anyone disagree? Again, does anyone know the pulse rate of this gun? Roy talks about the algorithm, but is not specific about it.

  9. #69
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    342

    Default I knew it

    Roy,

    The new truspeed gun by LTI. How did the Blinder M25 handle it. Did it JTG or did it get punch-throughs.







    Quote Originally Posted by radarroy View Post
    Just posted a "teaser" of some of the videos that were taken this year at SML on my blog

    SML 2008 Review - Radar Detector Shoot Out

  10. #70
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    342

    Default Thats exactly correct

    focalcivic,

    Thats exactly correct the J11 was not on the 904 nm. The new J15 is.







    Quote Originally Posted by focalcivic View Post
    Well, maybe it is just a software update that is needed for this gun and might not have to do with 904 as opposed to 905.

    I believe the older m25 J11 was not dead on 904 but close, and I think that compromised its overall performance. The newer J15 is just about on 904.

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •