Re: Difference between IO & QT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CJR238
You just need the balls to do it, and be smart enough to prove it.
Or you could just buy a competent radar detector in the first place, and avoid all the expense and hassle.
Re: Difference between IO & QT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealth Stalker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CJR238
You just need the balls to do it, and be smart enough to prove it.
Or you could just buy a competent radar detector in the first place, and avoid all the expense and hassle.
Very true! Too bad i haven't found one yet, but ill keep looking. ;)
Re: Difference between IO & QT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CJR238
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Riptide
Bottom line: It doesn't matter if its legal or not, or if its in the books. A cop can give you a ticket for smelling bad if they want to.
Absolutely. However it does matter if its legal or not, if what hes doing is not legal you can get it thrown out and get the officer reprimanded. You just need the balls to do it, and be smart enough to prove it.
True, but the officer still succeeded at putting you through hell.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealth Stalker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CJR238
You just need the balls to do it, and be smart enough to prove it.
Or you could just buy a competent radar detector in the first place, and avoid all the expense and hassle.
Alot of people add a V1 to an M3 remote to supplement. What do you think about adding a whistler 78SE?
Re: Difference between IO & QT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CJR238
Very true! Too bad i haven't found one yet, but ill keep looking. ;)
Actually, the only problem with the V1 is that it is too competent! :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Riptide
Alot of people add a V1 to an M3 remote to supplement. What do you think about adding a whistler 78SE?
Add it to what, the V1 or the M3?
Re: Difference between IO & QT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealth Stalker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CJR238
Very true! Too bad i haven't found one yet, but ill keep looking. ;)
Actually, the only problem with the V1 is that it is
too competent! :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Riptide
Alot of people add a V1 to an M3 remote to supplement. What do you think about adding a whistler 78SE?
Add it to what, the V1 or the M3?
The M3
Re: Difference between IO & QT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Riptide
Alot of people add a V1 to an M3 remote to supplement. What do you think about adding a whistler 78SE?
I don't see any advantage to running a V1 / Whistler combo as the V1 is superior in just about all aspects.
An M3 / Whistler duo combines the outstanding range of the M3 with excellent reactivity of the Whistler..........a good mix.
The M3 / V1 combination still provides the ultimate in Radar protection provided the M3 is a remote model and it's a good install. If your like me and prefer windshield mounts, then running a combo is out of the question.........you have to pick one and bear your cross (less range or slower reactivity).
Re: Difference between IO & QT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nine_c1
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Riptide
Alot of people add a V1 to an M3 remote to supplement. What do you think about adding a whistler 78SE?
I don't see any advantage to running a V1 / Whistler combo as the V1 is superior in just about all aspects.
An M3 / Whistler duo combines the outstanding range of the M3 with excellent reactivity of the Whistler..........a good mix.
The M3 / V1 combination still provides the ultimate in Radar protection provided the M3 is a remote model and it's a good install. If your like me and prefer windshield mounts, then running a combo is out of the question.........you have to pick one and bear your cross (less range or slower reactivity).
I meant an M3/78SE combo, the 78SE has a much shorter detection distance for the spectre than the V1
Re: Difference between IO & QT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Riptide
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nine_c1
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Riptide
Alot of people add a V1 to an M3 remote to supplement. What do you think about adding a whistler 78SE?
I don't see any advantage to running a V1 / Whistler combo as the V1 is superior in just about all aspects.
An M3 / Whistler duo combines the outstanding range of the M3 with excellent reactivity of the Whistler..........a good mix.
The M3 / V1 combination still provides the ultimate in Radar protection provided the M3 is a remote model and it's a good install. If your like me and prefer windshield mounts, then running a combo is out of the question.........you have to pick one and bear your cross (less range or slower reactivity).
I meant an M3/78SE combo, the 78SE has a much shorter detection distance for the spectre than the V1
Ah yes.........sorry, I didn't see your previous response.
I recently drove through VA with the RedLine and it did a fantastic job. Even though it's 100% stealth I was still paranoid as hell (a Sheriff road my tale for several miles).:p I'd have really been freaked out if I had a detectable RD in the car!
Re: Difference between IO & QT
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nine_c1
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Riptide
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nine_c1
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Riptide
Alot of people add a V1 to an M3 remote to supplement. What do you think about adding a whistler 78SE?
I don't see any advantage to running a V1 / Whistler combo as the V1 is superior in just about all aspects.
An M3 / Whistler duo combines the outstanding range of the M3 with excellent reactivity of the Whistler..........a good mix.
The M3 / V1 combination still provides the ultimate in Radar protection provided the M3 is a remote model and it's a good install. If your like me and prefer windshield mounts, then running a combo is out of the question.........you have to pick one and bear your cross (less range or slower reactivity).
I meant an M3/78SE combo, the 78SE has a much shorter detection distance for the spectre than the V1
Ah yes.........sorry, I didn't see your previous response.
I recently drove through VA with the RedLine and it did a fantastic job. Even though it's 100% stealth I was still paranoid as hell (a Sheriff road my tale for several miles).:p I'd have really been freaked out if I had a detectable RD in the car!
Haha yeah thats why I started with the STi-R, I know not that many cops have spectres but its more for my sanity/paranoia. I don't want to have to be like OMG cop hit kill switch quick...
Re: Difference between IO & QT
As one forum member stated in a post where I asked where did quick trigger come from, the member stated, he read it a few years ago by someone, maybe who just described the action as a quick trigger, fast on the gun? To me, quick trigger is an action by an officer, only. Quick trigger is just a means to do a fast I/O-off. I get I/Oed by troopers and the radar burst will last 3-5 seconds, which is just a mode by that unit, manufactor settings. But I/O can be turned on and left on. Quick trigger has got connected to Stalker radars for the 1/2 second burst which is faster than normal I/O burst as we assume it. A quick trigger can be any length of time, same as I/O. To trigger something can be done by a lot of ways. The word I/O is used alot now but is it a real standard? QT is not a standard. Both can be any length according to that manufactor mode for a limited burst or fast on the trigger finger...:)