-
I am not doubting the performance of the jammer heck I would expect any clone of the original AL g8 to perform quite well.
I have a marjor problem with how AQ and JTW go about their testing to bad mouth other jammers rather than doing a 100% fair test....Or how about they update their findings after a jammer changes. How about they actually hold all jammer companies to the same standards rather than bashing a few
Personally I am not a fan of the bashing they did of the LPP on the Traffic XR gun yet there is no proof that the LS jams that gun at all...Guessing it's a cloned AL g8 four head so I bet it jams the xr if they have the recent software....What about the testing of the LI on how they devised a test to show the fault in the first release generation instead of testing the most upto date version :roll:
-
^ I'm going to start quoting cVr on this one, from now on.
What brother cVr said above is PRECISELY how I feel about this whole thing.
If the LaserStar works as-advertised, then that's great. It's just another to the mix, and competition always helps drive the market to both innovate as well as will swing pricing in-favor of the consumer.
I just don't like the negativity brought about by those in the past called "The Four Horsemen," and now, "The Goons."
:x
-
I'm quite convinced at this point that the Laser * will work just fine, based on the fact that it's an obvious clone. However, posts like this one show an obvious shadiness to Laser *'s whole operation:
http://www.radardetector.net/viewtop...=36185&start=0
