GOL Spring Laser Jammer Test 2006 Results Posted!

[jimbonzzz]

http://www.guysoflidar.com

[RensoreK]

Awesome! A long awaited test!! :wink:

Doesn't seem like much difference between the two Anti-lasers. Also the results for AL were much more realistic than previous GoL tests.... Even with a 'manufacturer' supplied jammer.... hmmm... :shock:

[go.mouse]

Thanks for the hard work, GOL.

The AL prototype seems to do worse than the AL7 retail vs Stalker and Ultralytes.

Awesome! A long awaited test!! :wink:

Doesn't seem like much difference between the two Anti-lasers. Also the results for AL were much more realistic than previous GoL tests.... Even with a 'manufacturer' supplied jammer.... hmmm... :shock:

[JTW]

Punch through, punch through, and more ****ing punch through.

Anti-laser is a scam and that BMW video proves it. We now have two tests that confirm the AL7 doesn't perform as we were lead to believe.

JTW

[sethy]

Thanks for the hard work, GOL.

The AL prototype seems to do worse than the AL7 retail vs Stalker and Ultralytes.

Awesome! A long awaited test!! :wink:

Doesn't seem like much difference between the two Anti-lasers. Also the results for AL were much more realistic than previous GoL tests.... Even with a 'manufacturer' supplied jammer.... hmmm... :shock:

I know it. You know, originally testing the rear shot stuff, I thought we were testing the retail unit

[JTW]

BTW, I really appreciate the time you guys put into this.

Thank you!

[TeamQuack]

before i even read the results, thanks to all of the GoL for their hard worK and those that helped support them :wink:

[Suf Daddy]

Thanks GOL for the testing........

JTW: I think our perception of what the scope of a JTG should be, has changed:
http://www.radardetector.net/viewtop...11791&start=15

QUOTING: Suf Daddy:
"PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:27 pm Post subject:
I'd say things are getting BLURRED together.....

IMHO the AL ver 6.5 video show a JTG and a JFG in a straight line, NO off axis shooting.

So PARAPHRASING:"did they lie" in their video?.... or have our preceptions of the scope of a JTG grown?

Thinking outside of the box.... - Suf Daddy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Punch through, punch through, and more *BEEP* punch through.

Anti-laser is a scam and that BMW video proves it. We now have two tests that confirm the AL7 doesn't perform as we were lead to believe.

JTW

[JTW]

Thanks GOL for the testing........

JTW: I think our perception of what the scope of a JTG should be, has changed:
http://www.radardetector.net/viewtop...11791&start=30

QUOTING: Suf Daddy:
"PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:27 pm Post subject:
I'd say things are getting BLURRED together.....

IMHO the AL ver 6.5 video show a JTG and a JFG in a straight line, NO off axis shooting.

So PARAPHRASING:"did they lie" in their video?.... or have our preceptions of the scope of a JTG grown?

Thinking outside of the box.... - Suf Daddy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Punch through, punch through, and more *BEEP* punch through.

Anti-laser is a scam and that BMW video proves it. We now have two tests that confirm the AL7 doesn't perform as we were lead to believe.

JTW

That link comes up dead.

[stealthJamal]

It is noted that all the laser jammers were provided by the manufacters.

My opinion is the AntiLaser did the best out of the jammers tested based on the numbers and what I saw.

The LEO got big punch throughs on all jammer's runs due to his "secret targeting method" when his usual places he was shooting on the vehicle failed to get a reading. He shot each run starting with center mass as it would be done in the real world.