Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 50
  1. #1
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles Area
    Posts
    13,879

    Default 9500ci Laser Jamming Test Summary

    Well, RacerX and I shot laser guns at my 9500ci this morning with 4 different laser guns. RacerX did 95% of the shooting. First off, I like to thank RacerX for taking time to do this for me. Totally cool! He brought the guns, he came to where I was at, he spent several hours shooting away and all I gave him for his effort was a free sandwich! What a loser I am!

    Anyhow, here are the basics, and RacerX, please correct me if I make any mistakes here:

    1. Stalker - Completely smoked my ZR4s. It was almost like not having a jammer at all. If you live in an area where the Stalker is used, this jammer is not for you, IMO. Luckily, I have never seen one here in Cali. I plan to remove the current Veil and install the G4, if it ever hits the market that is. Maybe that will help some.

    2. Marksman - The ZR4s did pretty well against this gun. At first there was nothing past about 300ft, but later on in the day, RacerX started to figure out the weakest spots in my setup, which apparently are right between the foglights(my coat of Veil there is barely noticable), at the very upper corner of my headlights and at the very bottom center of my front plate. It would have to be a pretty close-in shot for me to not have any time to slow down.

    3. PLII - The ZR4s did excellent against this gun. I don't think that there were any PTs above 200ft and maybe not even 100ft.

    4. PLIII - Basically the same as the PLII, but slightly better.

    My rear coverage is similar to that of my front, but weak out at the edge of my tail lights. My rear shifter is pointed down at least 10 degrees. That will be fixed early this week. Both I and Racer X believe that this should give me decent coverage for the rear of the car once it is level.

    Anyhow, thanks again to RacerX! I really appreciate what he did for me today!

  2. #2
    Scratonicity Groupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,614

    Default

    :top: good stuff man. I hope G4 can help out those Stalker numbers, but like you I don't think it's in KY.
    RacerX is a class act.

  3. #3
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles Area
    Posts
    13,879

    Default

    One other thing I have figured out about the 9500ci is that it doesn't give a full laser alert while under about 20mph. Basically, it looks like Belscort figures that no LEO is going to tag a stopped car. The display still looks the same, "F Laser Shifting" or whatever but the alert is like, "bleep bleep" instead of the normal full laser alert.

  4. #4
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,770

    Default

    wat about the laser atlanta?

  5. #5
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles Area
    Posts
    13,879

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hockey005 View Post
    wat about the laser atlanta?
    Although we didn't test the LA specifically, RacerX seemed to think that the ZR4s would do very well against the LA, since it is very similar to the PLII.

  6. #6
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Rochester, NH
    Posts
    589

    Default

    Man looks like cheetah pass or LI is the only option for stalkers, man thats a rough gun, why is that thing so hard to beat anyways?

  7. #7
    Professional
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach, FL
    Posts
    1,406

    Default

    That lack of laser alert under 20 MPH may be a blessing if you get laser falses when stopped in traffic or in bumper to bumper traffic with other HID and ACC equipped cars.

    If I remember correctly, there's now multiple tests where the Stalker had higher PT numbers against the ZR4.(except for RR's test) Bummer. Maybe a software update could be developed and released to fix this, assuming it's not related to the Stalker's higher output?

    Thanks to both you and RacerX for taking the time to test and share your results.

  8. #8
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles Area
    Posts
    13,879

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kayrac View Post
    Man looks like cheetah pass or LI is the only option for stalkers, man thats a rough gun, why is that thing so hard to beat anyways?
    Here is a quote from g-zona about this very subject:
    Quote Originally Posted by g-zona View Post
    Guys, just a few clues:
    1. To jamm PLII you need great detection, cause of great optics and very narrow beam of PLII.
    2. To jamm LZ-1 you NEED POWER, period, detection is not a problem! For the power you need SPL-PL3!

    Keep that in mind when talking about jammers

  9. #9
    Scratonicity Groupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,614

    Default

    The only thing I can say to counter that point is that my batch of VEIL from 2005 absolutely waxed the Stalker. I hoping that the new G4 will do the same thing and offer led based jammer users relief.

  10. #10
    Cheetah Rep
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    2,567

    Default

    It was great meeting you and it was fun.
    Thanks for lunch.

    i think those numbers pretty much cover it. the PL2 was probably around 150' or so average. it's a Kmh gun, so i did quick conversions.
    as for the LA, besides the PL2 being the same pulse rate, on other tests, The ZR4 has done very well against the LA, including stealth mode.

    we figured out a few weak spots, which i think can be taken care of. yeah it had some trouble with the Stalker, but overall he has a great setup and a sweet ride.
    we didn't have time to play with the front heads at all, but it may possible to fine tune it and get better performance against the Stalker, at least time to slow if not better.



    for the rear head being so "off level" it did very well.
    some of the readings i think will be gone once that rear head is adjusted.

    As for the new G4, i'm looking forward to it. the aesthetics alone are a huge bonus.
    I think performance will be even better as well. i look forward to testing it on my bike and my truck, with before and after runs, with the old stuff, nothing, and new stuff.



    And as always, the invitations open for anyone in the phoenix area to test your setups.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Laser Jamming vs Radar Jamming penalty
    By a2b2c2d in forum Laser Jammers - General
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-20-2010, 11:34 PM
  2. who can test laser jamming on my vette in colorado?
    By bass mechanic in forum Local & Regional Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-09-2010, 09:24 PM
  3. LI + 9500ci Laser Testing Summary
    By djrams80 in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-05-2008, 12:58 PM
  4. Laser Jamming testing with Roy's tester - 60 sec test only?
    By mvanlone in forum Blinder Laser Jammers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-30-2007, 01:36 PM
  5. Jamming codes on police laser if you are jamming???
    By cr500 in forum Laser Jammers - General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-26-2007, 07:12 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •