
Originally Posted by
venom400

Originally Posted by
mswlogo
I set up a Excel Weight Matrix to compare the two.
The Weight Column basically means how important that feature is.
The next two are a score of how well each detector does on scale of 1 to 10.
The next two are weighted scores.
Then the weighted scores are totaled.
Keep in mind these are my own weights.
Certainly open to opinion on the unweighted scores.
I've attched the Excel spread sheet as well inside the zip file if you want to play.
EDIT: I updated the speadsheet to make it a little clearer (New Sheet has some RED Text)
preaty nice ,is it complete? I didn't see pop comparason , false alarms , etc..
It's work in progress for myself but I thought I would share it. I needed something to look at the big picture.
I don't care about Pop. People seem to care more about the side effects of Pop on vs Off than for Pop itself though. But I forgot about Q/T though but that's partly covered in a broad catagory of "Range". I May want to break that out a bit. Basically "Range" is all the tests GOL does and I gave it heavy weight and rated V1 significantly higher than IX.
False alarms is really covered by the different AutoMuting, Customization, GPS features. Having another "False" catagory would be doubling up on those features.
Bookmarks