Page 69 of 88 FirstFirst ... 1959676869707179 ... LastLast
Results 681 to 690 of 871
  1. #681
    Founder of Stealthvation
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    11,174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jag42 View Post
    On The Constant on test ..The Whistler 690 SE did better on 34.7 than the Pro 78 SE. On 35.5 Ka The 78 SE did better than the 690 SE. Manufacture variance?
    yes which plauges every manufacturer, some more than others

  2. #682
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SoCal - OC Style
    Posts
    2,478

    Default Re: GOL 2009 Radar WRAPPED UP!!!!!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Freebird View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Obsidian View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by nine_c1 View Post
    Exactly. If the 3.872 is similar to the 3.864 in performance.......which was my experience......then that puts a whole new light on this 2009 test and the V1 is near the bottom of the list on Ka Band range!

    Running the V1 with Ka guard off is simply not practical due to the crazy number of falses you will get on this band.
    ^ Good points you brought up in this thread. Most will just read 3.872 owned all and leave it at that. Looks like the STi was the real Ka champ ... which bodes well for the Redline.

    Quote Originally Posted by jmccam View Post
    The primary threat around my area is KA 34.7 and I get crazy good distance from my 9500ix and my X50(S7) is not far off. Having never owned a V1 I cannot speak the difference in performance but I am still satisfied with my Belscorts.

    Maybe I need to try and find V1 3.182 to run and see how they compare.
    I have the same two detectors you have and feel the same way about their 34.7 capabilities, though I think my 9500ix is better. I tried a V1 3.826 for 7 months and was not impressed with its Ka over hills and around corners ... to say the least.
    You need to try the STI 34.7 performance for 30 days bro. It is noticeably better than the ix and V1.
    Definitely a possibility, though I'm waiting on the initial impressions of the Redline. I may well get an STI though. I think my 9500ix days are over ... I've already given up on AutoLearn and I'm really not liking the difference "GPS on" makes against the instant on ...

    The main problem I'm seeing with the STI on 34.7 is in the main instant on test (nothing did well in the 2nd IO test) ... it only alerted to 2 of 6 on 34.7. The X50, and 9500ix with GPS off caught 6 of 6.

  3. #683
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Lubbock,Tx
    Posts
    3,497

    Default Re: GOL 2009 Radar WRAPPED UP!!!!!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by happya$$ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jag42 View Post
    On The Constant on test ..The Whistler 690 SE did better on 34.7 than the Pro 78 SE. On 35.5 Ka The 78 SE did better than the 690 SE. Manufacture variance?
    yes which plauges every manufacturer, some more than others
    How many times did Whistler report the Ka frequency out of all the Instant on tests? Does the Whistler have to sink in a radar alert for a few seconds to identify the source? Thanks last question for a while I'm just fixing to put my order in for a 78 SE !

  4. #684
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    St. Petersburg, Fl
    Posts
    3,305

    Default Re: GOL 2009 Radar WRAPPED UP!!!!!!!!

    I was disappointed in the q/t results, but I guess it will come down to how much q/t is a threat in the buyers area. If the STI was as good as the V1 on instant on testing, then with the stealthiness, it would be a no brainer for dashmount for a lot of people I feel.

  5. #685
    Cheetah Rep
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    2,567

    Default Re: GOL 2009 Radar WRAPPED UP!!!!!!!!

    For those who would like to get an idea of how the Redline would stack up in all of this, look at Roy's testing since he was using my 3.863 that was in this test.
    The 3.863 had default settings when Roy had it.

    And hell yeah, I run Ka guard off. Because I can.
    i get very few falses from it, and besides, we all deal with k band falses, a few ka alerts don't mean squat, when i may be getting something that everything else could miss.
    Oh, and for any whiners out there, at least the Belscorts were run in highway mode instead of the default auto mode.
    I wanted to run everything stock factory settings, but got vetoed.
    the belscorts filter out weak k band, so expect a loss of performance if you run it like that.
    Oh, and now i have RDR off on my STI-r as well.

  6. #686
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SoCal - OC Style
    Posts
    2,478

    Default Re: GOL 2009 Radar WRAPPED UP!!!!!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Freebird View Post
    I was disappointed in the q/t results, but I guess it will come down to how much q/t is a threat in the buyers area. If the STI was as good as the V1 on instant on testing, then with the stealthiness, it would be a no brainer for dashmount for a lot of people I feel.
    True ... that's why a lot of people have high hopes for the Redline, me included. I am really hoping it is essentially an improved STI.

  7. #687
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Upstate New York where the Stalker Dual is King
    Posts
    1,533

    Default Re: GOL 2009 Radar WRAPPED UP!!!!!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by RacerX View Post
    For those who would like to get an idea of how the Redline would stack up in all of this, look at Roy's testing since he was using my 3.863 that was in this test.
    The 3.863 had default settings when Roy had it.

    And hell yeah, I run Ka guard off. Because I can. [replacer_img]
    i get very few falses from it, and besides, we all deal with k band falses, a few ka alerts don't mean squat, when i may be getting something that everything else could miss.
    Oh, and for any whiners out there, at least the Belscorts were run in highway mode instead of the default auto mode.
    I wanted to run everything stock factory settings, but got vetoed.
    the belscorts filter out weak k band, so expect a loss of performance if you run it like that.
    Oh, and now i have RDR off on my STI-r as well.
    Where do you live..........in the desert ?

  8. #688
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    St. Petersburg, Fl
    Posts
    3,305

    Default Re: GOL 2009 Radar WRAPPED UP!!!!!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Obsidian View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Freebird View Post
    I was disappointed in the q/t results, but I guess it will come down to how much q/t is a threat in the buyers area. If the STI was as good as the V1 on instant on testing, then with the stealthiness, it would be a no brainer for dashmount for a lot of people I feel.
    True ... that's why a lot of people have high hopes for the Redline, me included. I am really hoping it is essentially an improved STI.
    I believe the Redline will deliver just that too. A STI on roids.

  9. #689
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    119

    Default Re: GOL 2009 Radar WRAPPED UP!!!!!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Freebird View Post
    Sti Beat the Ci and ix on 33.8
    Sti Beat the Ci and ix on 34.7
    Sti Tied the ix on 35.5 and beat all the V1's.

    STI owned at GOL 2009
    this is the reason why iam thinking about selling my v1 and buying the sti driver. IT seems to do really good, althought there is really no Q/T here in IL, and I raley see I/0. I see more moving isntant on then stationary. Will see, I am really intersed in the STI Driver.

  10. #690
    Cheetah Rep
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    2,567

    Default Re: GOL 2009 Radar WRAPPED UP!!!!!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by nine_c1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by RacerX View Post
    For those who would like to get an idea of how the Redline would stack up in all of this, look at Roy's testing since he was using my 3.863 that was in this test.
    The 3.863 had default settings when Roy had it.

    And hell yeah, I run Ka guard off. Because I can. [replacer_img]
    i get very few falses from it, and besides, we all deal with k band falses, a few ka alerts don't mean squat, when i may be getting something that everything else could miss.
    Oh, and for any whiners out there, at least the Belscorts were run in highway mode instead of the default auto mode.
    I wanted to run everything stock factory settings, but got vetoed.
    the belscorts filter out weak k band, so expect a loss of performance if you run it like that.
    Oh, and now i have RDR off on my STI-r as well.
    Where do you live..........in the desert ?
    Yeah, and its still a 100 frickin degrees here.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Anyone wrapped a car?
    By srtga in forum Car Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-19-2010, 02:59 PM
  2. Best Radar Detector of GOL 2009
    By V1DUDE in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-12-2010, 12:45 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-07-2009, 09:07 AM
  4. GOL 2009 Radar Videos
    By happya$$ in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 09-08-2009, 11:16 AM
  5. Best radar detector for 2009
    By Rockit in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 08-17-2009, 08:07 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •