X50 Rev 6.3

[jdong]

Come on folks, this isn't youtube or digg; can we just talk about radar/laser detectors without these flamewars?

[maskellxx]

Come on folks, this isn't youtube or digg; can we just talk about radar/laser detectors without these flamewars?

The man has a point.

[OzarkaWater]

Just curious, the Rev 6.3 still has the less complex, easier to manufacture "M4" receiver with the FCC ID of QKLX5M4 right?

[Qui-Gon]

I recently sent an e-mail to Escorrt concerning the availability of the rev. 6.3. As of yet, I have not heard back from them. Once I have, I will post my findings her for everyone to see.

[Tigger]

Just curious, the Rev 6.3 still has the less complex, easier to manufacture "M4" receiver with the FCC ID of QKLX5M4 right?

correct, it does, I just looked under my unit and it said that FCC ID. Im intersted on the differences and am looking forward to hearing a response to your email Victor

[Qui-Gon]

Well, I received a response back from Escort this afternoon. It did not specifically mention that there WAS a revision:

"It's good to hear from you! Revisions are not only based on software but for us are linked directly to hardware. Any change in components, suppliers, or software changes require a revision. Most revisions are for internal technical support and will not even be recognized by the end user. We do update revisions when detectors are sent in for repair. You would have to send the detector back to our factory in Ohio. Please call our Customer Service Department and they will set up a service number and give you instructions on how to return the X50 to us. If your X50 was purchased directly from us or from an authorized dealer and was purchased less than one year ago, there would be no charge since it would be under warranty. If it is out of warranty, the fee would be $59.95.
Thanks for your interest in Escort!"

Take it as you will...

Victor