8500 x50 or a non 8500 x50

[CJR238]

Yeah well those are results from 2006, and in the present real world the X50 out preforms the nonX50 in K and all Ka frequencys.

X2, and the 6.3/6.4 out preforms the rev 5 x50 too.

[ActiveKAjam]

X2, and the 6.3/6.4 out preforms the rev 5 x50 too.

Not surprising, just as I predicted.

[fordmustang]

Not surprising, just as I predicted.

yea well why do i keep hearing people say if you can get x50 rev5 its much better then the 6.3

[ActiveKAjam]

yea well why do i keep hearing people say if you can get x50 rev5 its much better then the 6.3

Like I was saying before, it's probably because everyone thinks the ramp up on the rev. 5 is perfect. If your looking for this 'perfect' ramp up, it's the same on the nonX50.

[CJR238]

also because the rev 5 uses more expensive parts than the new 6.3, there were a few really hot (very good) rev 5's that were awesome but thats the case with all RD's, there will always be variance's, good or bad.

Besides you cant get a rev 5 anymore, and even if you can find one who knows the real condition of it. Its safer to get a new 6.3 thats at least equal if not better in detection.

There is allot more to a RD than just pure sensitivity. A car that can go 160mph is int much good if it cant handle the turns anymore.