
Originally Posted by
TSi+WRX
^ I don't think that this is that simple, CJR.
The problem in this particular scenario is that the end-user had no choice - to me, it sounds like the detector chose to pursue its own lock-out, via AutoLearn, despite the fact that it was in a "High Risk" location.
Unfortunately, the detector itself has no way of knowing that it's in a "High Risk" location.
The technology is the problem - it's immature.
But honestly, even without AutoLearn - for example, if the OP had used manual TrueLock in those areas, for the same signals, I think that the fact that there were pre-existing lock-outs in that area would still have exposed him to a large risk, in this instance/circumstance.
Bookmarks