Reading this thread, it looks like they will sell more guns to enthusiasts than PDs. I believe I am more afraid of the Laser Atlanta updates than of the Laser Ally. I can see that having a much easier market.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: status on laser interceptor update to jam laser ally guns
Reading this thread, it looks like they will sell more guns to enthusiasts than PDs. I believe I am more afraid of the Laser Atlanta updates than of the Laser Ally. I can see that having a much easier market.
Re: status on laser interceptor update to jam laser ally guns
The new laser atlanta and the Pro Laser 4, they already have distubution networks and contracts with existing PD.s!!Originally Posted by switch626
Valentine One (3.858 Ice Cream Truck, 3.812 in Vette)
4 Head LI (On Vette) (7.11 CPU Regular heads front, HP Heads on the rear)
9500ci (On Vette)
LI Quad (On Ice Cream Truck)
LI Dual (On SRX, 7.06 CPU)
ProLaser II, ProLaser III, Stalker LZ-1, LTI Marksman & Laser Atlanta "R" (looking for an Ultralyte LRB)
2008 Corvette Z-51 Coupe
Escort 9500 ix (Cadillac SRX)
Re: status on laser interceptor update to jam laser ally guns
Originally Posted by Won Hunglo
They already have the lidars.
We have 2 units..1 in Denmark and one in USA. We also just got the TruCam...
Last edited by BlinderGuy; 11-26-2010 at 08:20 PM.
Re: status on laser interceptor update to jam laser ally guns
Send em Cliff's way. Might as well give them to a manufacturer that produces stable units...We have 2 units..1 in Denmark and one in USA. We also just got the TruCam...
Re: status on laser interceptor update to jam laser ally guns
Unnecessary comment.
Re: status on laser interceptor update to jam laser ally guns
Not any more unnecessary than the slander that Alpinestars (one of your guys) spreads about LI here. And since I got infracted specifically for a personal attack, not for "unnecessary" comments about a manufacturer, I know that my comment was acceptable in regards to the rules of this forum.
Re: status on laser interceptor update to jam laser ally guns
The infraction you got was from someone else and it fit..There is no infraction for attacking a manufacture..I am not a manufacturer...I am a dealer that is why it is a personal attack...Enough said ...Time to move on. And Alpinestars is not one of my guys..He is a member who has opinions. I do not even know him.Not any more unnecessary than the slander that Alpinestars (one of your guys) spreads about LI here. And since I got infracted specifically for a personal attack, not for "unnecessary" comments about a manufacturer, I know that my comment was acceptable in regards to the rules of this forum.
Re: status on laser interceptor update to jam laser ally guns
Where did you learn your logic from? A comment about a manufacturer is not a personal attack, but the same comment towards a dealer is a personal attack? Lol, I usually don't laugh out loud from the Internets, but this has me rolling.The infraction you got was from someone else and it fit..There is no infraction for attacking a manufacture..I am not a manufacturer...I am a dealer that is why it is a personal attack...Enough said ...Time to move on. And Alpinestars is not one of my guys..He is a member who has opinions. I do not even know him.Not any more unnecessary than the slander that Alpinestars (one of your guys) spreads about LI here. And since I got infracted specifically for a personal attack, not for "unnecessary" comments about a manufacturer, I know that my comment was acceptable in regards to the rules of this forum.
With that same reasoning, Cliff is in the same position as you. Thus, negating your Alpinestars comment.
And that being said, I am a member who has opinions as well... but I guess I can only make them known as long as they aren't about blinder, right?
Re: status on laser interceptor update to jam laser ally guns
someone sounds bitter
Re: status on laser interceptor update to jam laser ally guns
Last edited by yellowcab; 11-27-2010 at 03:43 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks