Difference between IO & QT

I tried to make a new thread with all the information and proof gathered but the forum wont allow it. :mad: too long????

Did it: http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...tml#post708808

-

If any Officer wants to take a hand radar gun, pull the trigger to turn it on and then pull it again real fast to turn it off to get a quick reading, there is nothing wrong with that to defeat a possible RD if the Officer thinks one is being used buy the speeder. To me that is QT and is fair game.... :)

Quote:

---

QT though perceived as a specific technique to defeat RD's it has no additional risk than regular I/O under most circumstances.

---

You need to change this to this:

"QT though perceived as a specific technique to defeat RD's it has no additional risk than regular I/O if you have a responsive RD such as the Valentine One."

:D You can even supplement your thread with a couple of my videos:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQsee1RrLAE]YouTube - Escort 9500ci and V1 3.813 vs. I/O Ka 35.5[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0OOhPcHdPc]YouTube - Escort 9500ci and V1 3.813 vs. Moving I/O Ka 34.7[/ame]

Quote:

---

In the end QT is not standard practice and any LEO using it unless otherwise stated specifically in your state is risking his job.

---

:lol::lol::lol: I guess a lot of TX DPS troopers as well as my locals are going to get fired.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by snoopyc4

Quote:

---

QT though perceived as a specific technique to defeat RD's it has no additional risk than regular I/O under most circumstances.

---

You need to change this to this:

"QT though perceived as a specific technique to defeat RD's it has no additional risk than regular I/O if you have a responsive RD such as the Valentine One."

---

QT, I/O laser at close to point blank range weather its a V1 or cobra will make no difference. A LEO using QT is going to be more selective than most. When touting the V1 over other manufacturers it is focusing on maybe a 1% chance unless you live in a QT rich area like you.

IMO you should do something about that. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by snoopyc4

Quote:

---

In the end QT is not standard practice and any LEO using it unless otherwise stated specifically in your state is risking his job.

---

:lol::lol::lol: I guess a lot of TX DPS troopers as well as my locals are going to get fired.

---

Only if someone does something about it there. I know i would, but it is Texas. :p

Quote:

---

QT, I/O laser at close to point blank range weather its a V1 or cobra will make no difference.

---

I agree. It's just this statement is a little misleading:

Quote:

---

QT though perceived as a specific technique to defeat RD's it has no additional risk than regular I/O under most circumstances.

---

QT does pose an additional risk to non-V1 users. Because if you are heading towards a QT trap, you may not get any advance warning when the LEO targets a car that is ahead of you. My first video demonstrates this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by snoopyc4

Quote:

---

QT, I/O laser at close to point blank range weather its a V1 or cobra will make no difference.

---

I agree. It's just this statement is a little misleading:

Quote:

---

QT though perceived as a specific technique to defeat RD's it has no additional risk than regular I/O under most circumstances.

---

QT does pose an additional risk to non-V1 users. Because if you are heading towards a QT trap, you may not get any advance warning when the LEO targets a car that is ahead of you. My first video demonstrates this.

---

I really just wanted to state the QT parameters with out discussing specific RD's but im sure after a few responses ill add some detail to help people with QT in there area.

It deepens if SS supports it or it becomes a Belscort vs V1 thread.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CJR238

I really just wanted to state the QT parameters with out discussing specific RD's

---

:D Alright, I'll stay out. I'm sure one of the other 150+ V1 zombies will barge in eventually though.

Quote:

---

but im sure after a few responses ill add some detail to help people with QT in there area.

---

:cool: Maybe I should make a thread called "Tips and Tricks for Handling TX DPS QT".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by snoopyc4

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CJR238

I really just wanted to state the QT parameters with out discussing specific RD's

---

:D Alright, I'll stay out. I'm sure one of the other 150+ V1 zombies will barge in eventually though.

Quote:

---

but im sure after a few responses ill add some detail to help people with QT in there area.

---

:cool: Maybe I should make a thread called "Tips and Tricks for Handling TX DPS QT".

---

Me and Quickcummins get Q/T all the time here in west Tx by DPS

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CJR238

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by snoopyc4

Quote:

---

QT, I/O laser at close to point blank range weather its a V1 or cobra will make no difference.

---

I agree. It's just this statement is a little misleading:

Quote:

---

QT though perceived as a specific technique to defeat RD's it has no additional risk than regular I/O under most circumstances.

---

QT does pose an additional risk to non-V1 users. Because if you are heading towards a QT trap, you may not get any advance warning when the LEO targets a car that is ahead of you. My first video demonstrates this.

---

I really just wanted to state the QT parameters with out discussing specific RD's but im sure after a few responses ill add some detail to help people with QT in there area.

It deepens if SS supports it or it becomes a Belscort vs V1 thread.

---

If you make the thread strictly about the facts of
1. What we define quick trigger as
and
2. What detectors can pick up radar bursts of what duration on what bands

(The second backed up by testing videos if necessary)

Then we can have a argument free thread. You can't argue with facts. They can go debate about if Q/T is a threat elsewhere. (thats opinion at this point it seems not facts ;) )