Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: 795 test run

  1. #11
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Well i've had it for quite a while now and overall I'd say I've been happy with it. I've had ample warning of LEOS in the area. Onlt fault so far and this might be true of most RD's but at a 90 degree angle to a LEO I get nothing. I was at a stop sign with a Leo on the road to my right. The 795 gave be a one led warning at the stop sign and did not go off full bar until i passed in front of him and turned onto the road.

  2. #12
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    RI
    Posts
    19

    Default E795 causing falsing?

    Regarding my mounting location. I don't have any tint on my windshield at all, so I know that there is nothing hampering a head-on signal from reaching the unit (I was careful to make sure of that). I never had problem with my ancient Cobra picking up store doors even when I was driving by on the highway, in the exact same mounting location...

    As far as the instant on, sure that's a possibility. However, I had the same issue whether on the highway or on city roads (where lazy cops just leave the RADAR on constant mode even when driving around). Perhaps with it not being the beginning or end of the month all the cops parked on the side of the road I've come across have just left their RADAR units at the station or have them off because they have no quota pressures.

    The reason I got this Bel to begin with was all the rave reviews I had read here praising the effectiveness of this device and even comparing it to pricier Bel's... For a casual speeder like myself, who seldom goes +5 to +10 over the posted highway speed limit, I thought this Bel would even be a little overkill (based on reviews here).

    I'm having a run of back luck with moving violations (3 in two years, for various reasons 1. forgot RD at home 2. was paced 3. had wife's car with no RD) and want decent protection just to know when I'm being observed or when the heat may be near.

    Another interesting thing is that I ran both the Cobra and E795 side by side. I would have thought the Bel would go nuts with falsing. In fact what was happening was the Cobra was falsing on K band at the rate of a chirp every 2-3 seconds. I noted this for miles, and at different locations where I knew there was nothing. Turning off the Bel shut the Cobra up everytime... The Bel was stone cold quiet the entire time.

    Is this evidence of a bad Bel, or is the Cobra just too loose with years of being direct wired into my dome light, left in the car during the summer and winter?

    I would send my unit for GOL to test, I just don't hink tests under "ideal" conditions (direct line of sight etc.) are meaningful for real world performace. Remember with the sensitivity range of this Bel's (per the tests), I should be picking up cops within blocks of my direction of travel. Instead they cross in front of me, I drive through speed traps and get nothing at all, it's kind of nerve racking especially in the close quarters driving of a city.

    Thanks for the helpful suggestions, much appreciated.

    Like I have said before, I will give it a bit more time to give it a fair shot, but if I had to decide today, I'm sad to say I'd return it to RS for a refund.

  3. #13
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Computer interfacing!!
    Posts
    538

    Default

    Detector Immediacy of Response Time

    Cobra 9700 1.24 seconds

    Cobra 9400 1.24 seconds

    Bel 895 .77 seconds

    Bel RX65 .67 seconds

    Bel V995 .60 seconds

    Escort 8500 X50 .96 seconds

    Valentine 1 1.01 seconds

    Whistler 1788 .73 seconds

    Whistler 1776 .73 seconds

    Whistler 1778 .73 seconds

    PNI RW 3000 1.48 seconds

    Radio Shack 3000 2.34 seconds

    Radio Shack Express 795 "zzz zz z Uh! Could you repeat the question??"

  4. #14
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    30

    Default

    No one expects the 795 to perform like a 300 dollar RD. If you drive mostly interstate or hwy i'd say it pretty much is okay. Sure it could be more sensitive but then no one buys this RD out of choice i'm sure. With the price being under 100 bucks it's more out of costs and neccessity. I'll upgrade later this year when i get the funds available but for now the 795 works very well for the price paid. No Falses and it detects LEO's in a decent amount of time, not great, but decent.

  5. #15
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    11,015

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TexasDriver
    No one expects the 795 to perform like a 300 dollar RD. If you drive mostly interstate or hwy i'd say it pretty much is okay. Sure it could be more sensitive but then no one buys this RD out of choice i'm sure. With the price being under 100 bucks it's more out of costs and neccessity. I'll upgrade later this year when i get the funds available but for now the 795 works very well for the price paid. No Falses and it detects LEO's in a decent amount of time, not great, but decent.
    Yeah I think this could also be part of the problem... people comparing detection range to 'The top 3' and other such high end detectors...could also be some lemons. Hopefully Boomerman gets his 795 to GOL testing to see what they find.

  6. #16
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Computer interfacing!!
    Posts
    538

    Default

    Why not steer people to older models that do work ? Examples would be the Escort Passport 8500 or Bel Vector 985. I thought the purpose of this forum was to help us avoid tickets!! :x

  7. #17
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    701

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vw242
    Detector Immediacy of Response Time

    Cobra 9700 1.24 seconds

    Cobra 9400 1.24 seconds

    Bel 895 .77 seconds

    Bel RX65 .67 seconds

    Bel V995 .60 seconds

    Escort 8500 X50 .96 seconds

    Valentine 1 1.01 seconds

    Whistler 1788 .73 seconds

    Whistler 1776 .73 seconds

    Whistler 1778 .73 seconds

    PNI RW 3000 1.48 seconds

    Radio Shack 3000 2.34 seconds

    Radio Shack Express 795 "zzz zz z Uh! Could you repeat the question??"

    LMAO. Classic post.

  8. #18
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vw242
    Why not steer people to older models that do work ? Examples would be the Escort Passport 8500 or Bel Vector 985. I thought the purpose of this forum was to help us avoid tickets!! :x
    Hey, I'd stear them towards any of the "Big Three". If someone had the cash to spend on them i'm sure they wouldn't have gotten an 100 dollar or below RD. Whatever model they have or have a question about they deserve a fair response and opinions are just fine too. My opinion is if you want a RD that gives you better range and quicker response time then you are gonna have to spend alot more. If you want something that gives you an ok response time and ok range and you have to spend 100 bucks on it the 795 is fine. Not to say that other's experience with the RD is a good one but that could be challked up to different reasons i.e. bad RD, driving way to carless with a cheaper model and so forth.

  9. #19
    Professional
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    928

    Default

    I think many of you are comparing the 795 in performance to the big 3 and it is not a fair judgement.
    I bought the 795 to test against other low end units like the Whistler PRO.
    I know the 795 is no V1, X50 or RX65 and it is not meant to compete with them.
    This unit is for people who do not want to spend a lot of money on a radar detector but still wants some kind of protection.
    For a unit that costs under $100 it is hard to beat.
    Yes the range is not that good but it is on par with any detector in its price range.

    What little time I have had to use it and test it, mine has done very well, I have given it to speedqueen to use and she has given me some good reports on it when she is using it, and believe me her name fits her well, she drives like a wild woman!! It has saved her a few times.

    I do not know why some of you are saying it does not work that good, well what do you want for a low end detector??
    If you are serious about your speeding then you should NOT even consider buying a low end unit period.
    I have tested this with my K band gun and X band gun and I have gotten plenty of time to reduce my speed before I could visually be targeted.
    Yes the range is short compared to my V1 and other units I have but I expect that from a low end unit.

    As for suggesting older units like the Bel 980 or 985 or Escort 8500, I do suggesst people look for these units. But a lot of people do not want to buy a used unit or do not want to buy one off of ebay.

    You can get some great detectors off of ebay and you can get some junk ones as well.
    I tell a lot of people to save a few more $$ and buy a good used V1 version 1.7 off of ebay.
    For the money that unit is hard to beat, even today it still will run with the best of them, yes it does not detect POP but for many that is not a problem.
    They can use this while they save some more money and then have it upgraded to the latest and greatest. Sometimes this ends up costing more than buying a new one in the long run but some people can not afford all of that money at one time.
    For me I have been lucky on buying used units off of ebay, but I know others who have not.

    For those who say the 795 does not work I really do not have an answer as to why they do not work for you, but I have tested mine and I know for the money it is not a bad unit.
    I also realize it is NO V1 but I can deal with that.

  10. #20
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    RI
    Posts
    19

    Default Range

    It was in a test reviewing the E795 where they say that the range is comparable to a top shelf detector...

    They comapered (in the test) to two low end Whistlers (sub $100 models from RS), but they said the range of E795 was up there with much more expensive units.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Test volunteers wanted for Miami Laser jammer test
    By venom400 in forum Laser Jammers - General
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 09-27-2009, 09:23 AM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-22-2009, 10:51 AM
  3. gol 2007 test no over the hill test
    By gadgetdude in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-19-2008, 02:07 PM
  4. Results from Aug. 17th RD Test Inconsistent with the Results from the Off-Axis Test?
    By ZJamaican in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-16-2008, 11:30 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •