|
|
Yet again Roy hasn't commented on this. I wonder if it's because the concern of sales with the 4.5 version that he may still have in stock? I hope that is not the case since most of what I have read is Roy always being sincere. Why isn't any of the testers discussing this new version? Is something wrong with it? Will it out perform every radar detector out there? (Wishful thinking on my part.) ROY, Admins, Please help us out here....
Bel RX65
M4 rev. 2.9
let me ask you guys i have one of the new rx65 with the 2.9 and i was going down i-75 doing about 80 mph i picked up a k band it was a shieriff coming towards me with constant on i slowed to 70 it was about a half of mile i went before we met he was probaly coming at me at about 75 to 80 mph i say that cause they normally do about 10 over is that a good distance to pick him up with both of us moving towards each other havnt came accross one sitting still yet and also should i run it in usa or int i see usa picks up better im in int now
Help from Roy or any Admin who may have some additional insite as to the New version M4 2.9 Rev. I wonder why this isn't a concern for them?
For what it's worth, I just bought an RX65 from Roy a week ago. It's V 2.9, and FCC ID: QL4G7M4.
Why is it that no Admin or Roy is commenting on this. At least we now know that one of Roy's RX65 units is an M4 2.9 ver. Can it be possible that we know things before the expert testers? Come on guys, what is it going to take for Roy or someone else to get us feedback on this? I'm just an End user, and I know more about this new ver 2.9 than the people who do testing?
My take:
Until there are verified reports of anyone with newer than v2.9 for an M4, then consider that the latest version.
The QL4G7M4 RX-65 has a different RF receiver than the QL4G1S7 RX-65. But are there any performance differences between the two? We won't know until they are tested.
Jim
Thank you Jim, Thank you for at least responding to our concerns. Since this is the most current version, is it possible for someone to conduct a simple test between this new version and the older version?
Thanks again!
Just as an FYI, and this is all here-say from Bel. The new M4 is suppose to perform 5-10% better overall than it's previous versions. I don't know how true this hype is, but this came from a customer service personell at Bel. They didn't specify which version, so I can't say for sure if they were refering to the 4.3 or 3.6 . Now 5-10% in what??? They won't go into details, I hope it is in laser detection, or just at least better distance like the x50. I hope someone can confirm this information with a test. Maybe someone else can get confirmed inside information.
:wink:
well this is interesting... i am in the process of looking for a new detector and the RX 65 was at the top of the list.
ill just wait and watch this thread
Talk about confusion, I am glad I followed back up with this thread, I was like WTF 2.9? So now Bel is confusing us more and going down in version numbers, geesh. :shock: :? 8)
So now the offical NEWEST hardware/software is: M4/2.9
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks