MY display was hard to read... ok... not at all... under sunlight, but it looks like I may have been an exeption. As for range, I didn't find it anything to right home about...
http://www.radardetector.net/My-RX65...-%28-9169t.php
MY display was hard to read... ok... not at all... under sunlight, but it looks like I may have been an exeption. As for range, I didn't find it anything to right home about...
http://www.radardetector.net/My-RX65...-%28-9169t.php
I agree, the screen on the RX55 was hard for me to read when the sun was coming down from above but I assume the RX65's screen is similar.
The range does lack on the 55 no where near the 65's!Originally Posted by KahneFan
Does anyone know if anyone has, or is in the process of doing any tests on the RX65 with the new M4 2.9 version compared to say the 4.5 and the other top detectors ?
You would think after reading the tests @ http://www.radarbusters.com/support/product-tests/2.asp that with the RX55 being .2-.3 different in range that it would perform well. I guess that's not so true (assuming my unit was working correctly).
Nevermind, I misread the subject, I thought we were talking about the 65ops:
Well, we kinda are now... *Shrugs* I sent back my RX55 and exchanged it for the RX65... Will have it Thursday.
Bookmarks