|
|
I know EXACTLY the area you are talking about. I used to live in Stow and sometimes would take that route. The cops there are REALLY bad. Maybe we can meet up there and you can hop in the passengers side and witness the results for yourself. My wife works in Akron so I can meet her for lunch or something.
RIP Duncan my BELOVED black lab son 8/7/99-3/23/11. I will miss you DEARLY.
http://www.criminalcustomzshop.com/
LET THE BIRTH OF MANY TESTING GROUPS HAPPEN!
You want to know what it is like doing something for the love and passion and not for the mighty dollar then look up GOL!
buyradardetectors rocks!
Sounds good, shoot me a PM... maybe sometime later this week or early next we give it a try...Originally Posted by happya$$
A cool video would be first to drive through with the V1 note the falses. Then drive through with the X50, note the falses... then finally we'll give it a runthrough with the trusty Rx65 and see if there are any more or less falses.
I really have never seen any proper false comparison videos... should be interesting.
The RX65 really does have at least some degree of "smart filtering." Some frequencies of X-band alert when they pass just a bar or two in the Autoscan setting, but a traffic light sensor on X-band that I tested it against didn't alert until I was right on top of it in Autoscan. Highway warned on the same sensor well around a curve at almost a mile.
I have had my RX-65 for about 2 months now. I upgraded from the Bel Vector 985. I travel about 60 miles a day and a different route each day of the week. Monday is one route, Tuesday is a different route. But they are the same each week. I have a lawn service.
What I can say is oh yeah much better filtering. When I come to a light where a CVS pharmacy is my old one used to chirp forever while sitting at the light. With the RX-65 it's maybe once or twice while sitting there. Great filtering.
Jason
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks