Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 45
  1. #31
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles Area
    Posts
    13,879

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by focalcivic View Post
    but GOL tests with the jammers on the bumper as stated before.
    This is a totally different scenario. GOL does this for obvious reasons:

    1. Quick and easy installations

    2. For fairness sake to all the jammers.

  2. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    342

    Default Too Funny :)

    Quote Originally Posted by djrams80 View Post
    This is a totally different scenario. GOL does this for obvious reasons:

    1. Quick and easy installations

    2. For fairness sake to all the jammers.

    djrams80,

    You guys are too much man. LoL!


  3. #33
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    354

    Default

    I'm certainly not accusing you of trying to trick anyone. But you have to admit, with all the bullsh1t thats gone on with laser jammers, you need to go the extra mile to maintain your reputation.

    I won't sit here and critique your technique any more, since I am sure you know the perceived flaws. But I urge you to try and help us out and make some changes. A little effort goes a long way.

    Wish I could come out and test with you, but Boston is far far away. Also, the laser atlanta is the biggest threat around here and front plates are a must.

    Goodluck, and I sincerely hope the new blinder does well. It's good for everyone, good for me since I am in the market for a jammer, good for guys with ZR4 and LPP and all other jammers because the added competition keeps prices lower and quality higher.

  4. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    342

    Default I agree

    Quote Originally Posted by DougiesGoinDeep View Post
    I'm certainly not accusing you of trying to trick anyone. But you have to admit, with all the bullsh1t thats gone on with laser jammers, you need to go the extra mile to maintain your reputation.

    I won't sit here and critique your technique any more, since I am sure you know the perceived flaws. But I urge you to try and help us out and make some changes. A little effort goes a long way.

    Wish I could come out and test with you, but Boston is far far away. Also, the laser atlanta is the biggest threat around here and front plates are a must.

    Goodluck, and I sincerely hope the new blinder does well. It's good for everyone, good for me since I am in the market for a jammer, good for guys with ZR4 and LPP and all other jammers because the added competition keeps prices lower and quality higher.

    DougiesGoinDeep,

    Ok give me some suggestions for my next test and I will do them. I agree with your last statement on competition. Yes it really does help the consumer like yourself looking for the best bang for the buck. You should also consider the company and how long they have been in business. Also reliability is "KEY" if the jammer is the best performer, but has only been on the market for 2 years and has had problems, then that would concern me. Just something to note!


  5. #35
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    354

    Default

    I think many of the suggestions here have been good, I will take some of those and add a few:

    -more "permanent" looking install, deeper in the grill, etc. (on a side note it would be great to compare a high and low position install)
    -front plate, definately...not sure if its required in Georgia but it is for many of us, you could do runs with and without it
    -more guns if available...different states have different threat...i couldn't care less about stalker results as long as laser atlanta is JTG (some other guys might say the same about ultralight)
    -rear jammer performance
    -the 1 vs 2 head comparison is great
    -I'm sure there is more, and people here will pitch in there responses

  6. #36
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    342

    Default Did test today on single head

    Quote Originally Posted by DougiesGoinDeep View Post
    I think many of the suggestions here have been good, I will take some of those and add a few:

    -more "permanent" looking install, deeper in the grill, etc. (on a side note it would be great to compare a high and low position install)
    -front plate, definately...not sure if its required in Georgia but it is for many of us, you could do runs with and without it
    -more guns if available...different states have different threat...i couldn't care less about stalker results as long as laser atlanta is JTG (some other guys might say the same about ultralight)
    -rear jammer performance
    -the 1 vs 2 head comparison is great
    -I'm sure there is more, and people here will pitch in there responses


    DougiesGoinDeep,

    Sounds good, but we did a single Blinder M25 J15 head test today on a black mercedes benz. The guys name is HALLSOUND and he is a forum member. Our results were great. We only got one punch-through all day with the single head. It was just over 200 foot punch-through on drivers side head light. our test started at 1025 feet. We did like, 4 single head runs and it JTG 3 out of 4. Video will be up on youtube tomorrow. His car is setup with 3 Blinder heads on the front. So its a Blinder M35. He is putting his Blinder M20 on the rear next week. We will then test it. Thanks for the comments.


  7. #37
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    354

    Default

    Yeah, I should have made that more clear. I saw those single head results and they are great. Keep up the good work. Looking foward to any new videos you may make.

  8. #38
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lakeland,Fl
    Posts
    2,702

    Default

    My install isnt very stealthy because its not always possible. Check pics out.
    http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/f...8/PIC_0680.jpg
    http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/f...PIC_0678-1.jpg

    I asked Don about install and he advised not to change it. It was best as is. I know its not Blinder but I can understand the non stealthy installs!!

  9. #39
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    342

    Default WoW!

    Quote Originally Posted by mhardy2288DougiesGoinDeep View Post
    My install isnt very stealthy because its not always possible. Check pics out.
    http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/f...8/PIC_0680.jpg
    http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/f...PIC_0678-1.jpg

    I asked Don about install and he advised not to change it. It was best as is. I know its not Blinder but I can understand the non stealthy installs!!

    mhardy2288,

    Those heads are HUGE!! If your getting any punch-throughs with this 4 head PASS I would be alittle concerned. We tested a Single head Blinder M25 J15 today on a mercedes benz 300e sedan. We hit the blinder starting around 1025 feet and only got one punch-through on the Drivers side head light at 200 feet. After hitting the passenger side head light and center mass shots, we got JTG the rest of the day. We will be testing a 4 head Lasermask next week on a SUV. I'm looking forward to those results.

  10. #40
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Some where in the Bluegrass State
    Posts
    2,115

    Arrow Leon..

    Leon is an incredible guy, Very cool I still firmly beleive in blinder, as i've witnessed even a none j-15 version do some decent damage to many a lidar in the correct configeration it can pose as a very decent frontal jammer. Although it is a very great frontal jammer to the rear, I have noticed major punchthroughs that are utmostly upsetting, although this test WAS NOT preformed on a J-15 Rev. It was made on a previous Rev. #. I have been informed from Leon that the J-15 Rev. Is a higher powered Led unit than previous Blinder units. He also said that the internals have been beefed up a tad more, thus as you saw producing a harder jam than previous blinder units.



    AlPiNe~
    Last edited by alpinestars_2002795; 06-22-2008 at 09:31 PM.
    Spectre III RDD, (2)VG2 RDD, Uniden LRD950 w/dfr7update, Uniden R7, (2) RPSE, Escort Max 2, Marksman LTI 20-20 Lidar, Ultralyte 100lr lidar, 2 Pro-Laser iii, Z-25 mph K-band w/pop 16ms, mph python iii-x band, mph python ii-k band, kustom falcon k band, Stalker ATR 34.7ghz Ka mov/sta w/remote, Laser Atlanta, stalker lz1,
    Talon Ka 35.5GhzKa, Vascar IIIC, Vascar II Plus, Vascar Plus, Kustom Pro-1000 K-band w/K55 remote better i/o, (2)K55 X-Band's, Laser Interceptor Tri Head, Cheetah C550 GPS with platinum trinity 3.0 databases, Wilson Pro 5000/little wil ant, cobra 29ltd classic, Galaxy 959b W/RF Gain SSB, (2) pro520xl, (2) Pro510xl cb, Waze via iPhone 6s/Galaxy s9, Roav C2 pro Dashcam with Sony Starvis nightview, Canon EOS7D, 1080p watchcam for roadside evidence 16Gb.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. New Blinder M25 VS Ultralyte
    By steagall1000 in forum Blinder Laser Jammers
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-24-2008, 05:00 PM
  2. Blinder M25 Against the Kustom PL3, LTI Ultralyte LR Rev. 2
    By jah in forum Blinder Laser Jammers
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-20-2008, 08:40 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •