Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Sky

  1. #11
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Kirkland, Wa
    Posts
    96

    Default

    S2000 first choice, personally id find a miata rather than the sky or solstice. but deffinintly solstice over the saturn. i mean cmon, SATURN

  2. #12
    Professional
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    1,192

    Default

    Thanks guys...yeah that was my thought...I enjoy the Pontiac name over the Saturn name as well... Time to go car shopping :wink: thx fellas

  3. #13
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    In front of my computer
    Posts
    10,773

    Default

    Wait for the turbo Solstice with the Saab engine block :wink:

  4. #14
    Power User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Southlake, TX
    Posts
    4,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmaartAasSaabr
    Wait for the turbo Solstice with the Saab engine block :wink:
    Thatll be fun!!!!!!!

  5. #15
    Professional
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    1,192

    Default

    Pontiac has the Soltice GXP...which is new for this year 260HP as opposed to the 177HP it had last year

    260hp in a small car like that would rock and roll

    http://www.pontiac.com/solstice/index.jsp

  6. #16
    Power User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Southlake, TX
    Posts
    4,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aaseavey
    Pontiac has the Soltice GXP...which is new for this year 260HP as opposed to the 177HP it had last year

    260hp in a small car like that would rock and roll

    http://www.pontiac.com/solstice/index.jsp
    and the S2000 pushes 240 (on the newer ones with the 2.2l F22C) or 250 (Older ones with the 2.0l F20C) HP, and thats N/A, strap a turbo on there and youre haulin


    just my litle rant




    I think that kind of power on that car is a bit overkill, you go plenty fast with the regular base models (Of course go with some "Luxury" options), so why sac a bit of mileage for a supercharged one

  7. #17
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    In front of my computer
    Posts
    10,773

    Default

    The big difference is powerband. The turbo Solstice's torque curve is more or less "flat" along the revs. As a result you get nice linear horsepower increase as revs go up. The engine breathes very well at low speed due to the turbocharger (and variable valve timing and direct injection).

    The S2000 motor however has only variable valve timing and the way it is set up, the torque output of the engine is pretty low. To make power you have to really rev the engine out, which can be fun. But this means that you have to "work" harder to go fast, not just push the pedal in any gear at any speed like the Solstice, but rather downshift, not one but two or three gears, maybe four This also means that you don't have the same kind of powertrain flexibility as the Solstice, which let's say can run in 5th gear from 20 mi/h to 120 mi/h, and have good power from say 40 to 120, whereas 5th will only give you acceleration from 80 to 120 in a S2k.

    I still think a supercharger or turbo to boost low-end power on an S2000 would complement the engine nicely.

  8. #18
    Experienced
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    205

    Default

    buy the sky and spend a few hundred to rebadge it to the opel gt (what the sky is sold as outside the us)

  9. #19
    Power User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Southlake, TX
    Posts
    4,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmaartAasSaabr
    The big difference is powerband. The turbo Solstice's torque curve is more or less "flat" along the revs. As a result you get nice linear horsepower increase as revs go up. The engine breathes very well at low speed due to the turbocharger (and variable valve timing and direct injection).

    The S2000 motor however has only variable valve timing and the way it is set up, the torque output of the engine is pretty low. To make power you have to really rev the engine out, which can be fun. But this means that you have to "work" harder to go fast, not just push the pedal in any gear at any speed like the Solstice, but rather downshift, not one but two or three gears, maybe four This also means that you don't have the same kind of powertrain flexibility as the Solstice, which let's say can run in 5th gear from 20 mi/h to 120 mi/h, and have good power from say 40 to 120, whereas 5th will only give you acceleration from 80 to 120 in a S2k.

    I still think a supercharger or turbo to boost low-end power on an S2000 would complement the engine nicely.
    I agree, STOCK, the S2000 LACKS ALL POWER in the low revs.....its pretty peaky, you do need something to compensate, but at the 7 or 8000 mark it just takes off...............it does need compensation at the low end

    oh yeah and you forgot Hondas advantage over other Variable Valve Timing systems........the Electronic Lift Controller VTEC

  10. #20
    Power User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Southlake, TX
    Posts
    4,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trainedmonkey
    buy the sky and spend a few hundred to rebadge it to the opel gt (what the sky is sold as outside the us)
    but underneath it all its still a Saturn......id get the Pontiac

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •