
Originally Posted by
marker227
I was actually VERY interested in that car and talked to my local mechanic that we go to a lot and they said it was ****. Very unreliable they told me.
^ I wouldn't say so....at least not any more than any other 10+ year-old vehicle, and when framed in terms of upgraded/modified vehicles, I have a similar opinion as well.
The problem is that many of these vehicles have such extensive community databases of potential trouble-spots and their fixes that, to the uninitiated, they may think "OMG, this is a huge list of problems, these must not be very reliable vehicles!"
Additionally, one has to keep in-mind the market to which these vehicles not only currently appeal to, but appealed to when they were either "showroom new" or just a few years out of the showroom.
Current appeal is mostly with the younger, less affluent "tuner" crowd, and as such, not only is dollars-spent for quality replacement parts, service, or aftermarket parts a concer, but so is owner mechanical empathy, ability, and understanding. Thus, many of these cars have, literally, been "driven to the ground," again making for a bad appearance at, say, the local garage.
And even when they were new, they still typically appealed to either younger or more aggressive drivers - both of which are still not conducive to vehicle reliability measures.
Properly cared-for, DSMs in good condition are no worse everyday, day-in/day-out drivers than any other vehicle of similar vintage and scale of modification/upgrades. I've daily-driven DSMs since early 1992, and never has one given me any headaches, even my upgraded ones - and all I typically do is just normal maintenance in my garage or driveway.
The general perception that "DSMs aren't reliable" simply isn't true - they're as reliable as any other car of that general vintage (when matched for vehicle condition, mileage, and care), and, more importantly, your efforts and diligence make them out to be.

Bookmarks