GoL Future Laser Testing: Let your opinion be known.

**thestaton** · 09-20-2007, 09:34 AM

Would you like to see the GoL add 2 more elements to our laser jammer testing? I am thinking we should add a side mirror shot & roof line shot. Both of which are deadly and I believe will help further separate the men from the boys.

So what do you think?

**IRCMUSA** · 09-20-2007, 09:51 AM

yea just for kicks!!
in some of our videos maybe he is missing the headlamp all togeather and cliping a mirror who knows.

**interceptor** · 09-20-2007, 11:50 AM

how about receiver sensitivity test?

**crazyVOLVOrob** · 09-20-2007, 01:27 PM

Originally Posted by thestaton

Would you like to see the GoL add 2 more elements to our laser jammer testing? I am thinking we should add a side mirror shot & roof line shot. Both of which are deadly and I believe will help further separate the men from the boys.

So what do you think?

Honestly how often to cops aim at that area?

Maybe an un-offical roofline and mirror test. Cause shooting laser the at the front plate is usually instant reading

I would like to see a Euro Style retro reflective plate to make the jammer work extra hard

**lilmikey** · 09-20-2007, 04:57 PM

I just want to see GOL do short/close range shots if it has'nt been done.
Start hitting at like 300ft or less

**MetalFlame** · 09-22-2007, 11:03 AM

I would LOVE to see,if GOL could "simulate" the automatic laser speed trap.
I know a lot of European members(myself included) would like to see this to be tested.

**RacerX** · 09-22-2007, 11:41 AM

what are the distances on those auto speed traps?
sounds like a good test.

also i like that 300' test, or something similar.
maybe 300-500', "ambush" test, shooting at the near headlight, off to the side, to simulate those close shots.

**MetalFlame** · 09-22-2007, 02:38 PM

Originally Posted by RacerX

what are the distances on those auto speed traps?
sounds like a good test.

aprox.30 to 80meters(90-240ft.)

**Asleeper** · 10-02-2007, 02:27 PM

Originally Posted by IRCMUSA

yea just for kicks!!

x2, for fun maybe, but its of little value in the real world.

Another good test, rear protection. Testing the effectiveness of rear head placement, like will a single head provide enough protection.

**KnightHawk** · 10-08-2007, 09:09 PM

I think the test has to be as real world as possible or it will be useless, time consuming and a wasted effort unless you guys would like to do it for fun. It's you guy's time and effort anyway - nobody would care.

I agree with Asleeper.

Another good test, rear protection. Testing the effectiveness of rear head placement, like will a single head provide enough protection.