Page 10 of 18 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 173
  1. #91
    Professional
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,299

    Default Re: GOL 2008 Laser Results Posted!

    Quote Originally Posted by jimbonzzz View Post
    ... and a front plate too
    Hmmm... I have a feeling that a larger less reflective car (last year) vs a smaller but more reflective car would mean slightly better results for jammers with better reception (last year) vs better output (this year).


    BTW did you guys do some single head testing by any chance?

  2. #92
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,715

    Default Re: GOL 2008 Laser Results Posted!

    Quote Originally Posted by ahmadr View Post
    Hmmm... I have a feeling that a larger less reflective car (last year) vs a smaller but more reflective car would mean slightly better results for jammers with better reception (last year) vs better output (this year).


    BTW did you guys do some single head testing by any chance?
    Stop kidding yourself, no one wants to see anymore JTG from you or LI

    Dude you have an LI on a small car with no hardpoints mounted centrally...

    My head is allready spinning with JTG JTG JTG JTG JTG
    Last edited by Ovencleaner; 08-08-2008 at 09:18 AM.

  3. #93
    Scratonicity Groupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,614

    Default Re: GOL 2008 Laser Results Posted!

    Quote Originally Posted by ahmadr View Post
    Hmmm... I have a feeling that a larger less reflective car (last year) vs a smaller but more reflective car would mean slightly better results for jammers with better reception (last year) vs better output (this year).


    BTW did you guys do some single head testing by any chance?
    no single head. not enough time in the day.

  4. #94

    Default Re: GOL 2008 Laser Results Posted!

    Not to take away anything from GOL and the wonderful job and service they did and provide but CFL#6 will be making a set of runs against LI with just a single sensor as well as the focus of the session, comprehensive testing with the new TruSpeed against the LI, ZR4, Laser Mask, PASS, LPP, Blinder J15, AL G8 and any other Countermeasures that may show up!

    Cliff - C55
    Last edited by Laser-InterceptorUSA; 08-08-2008 at 09:25 AM.

  5. #95
    Professional
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,414

    Default Re: GOL 2008 Laser Results Posted!

    Thanks for your testing, GOL. Very interesting results.

    But what was so surprising? What is this "game changer" that happya$$ kept referring to? The most surprising thing I noted in the results was the J15 Blinder performed well and the Laser * sucked.

    Everything else was pretty much as expected. LI = JTG all day and 9500ci > all.

    Did I miss something?

    Anyway, thanks again. I think maybe the Goons are already renaming thier jammer 'cause they knew it sucked and once these results got published they knew they wouldn't sell any more.


  6. #96
    Professional
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,299

    Default Re: GOL 2008 Laser Results Posted!

    Quote Originally Posted by C55 View Post
    Not to take away anything from GOL and the wonderful job and service they did and provide but CFL#6 will be making a set of runs against LI with just a single sensor as well as the focus of the session, comprehensive testing with the new TruSpeed against the LI, ZR4, Laser Mask, PASS, LPP, Blinder J15, AL G8 and any other Countermeasures that may show up!

    Cliff - C55
    We want that single head on the biggest baddest SUV you have

    let's see some punchthroughs!!

  7. #97
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    7,732

    Default Re: GOL 2008 Laser Results Posted!

    Quote Originally Posted by Retaliation View Post
    But what was so surprising? What is this "game changer" that happya$$ kept referring to? The most surprising thing I noted in the results was the J15 Blinder performed well and the Laser * sucked.
    I think it's the LaserMask.

    Pretty darned low cost - and nearing the performance of the M25 J11.

    VEIL that sucker, and that does change the game a bit.....

  8. #98

    Default Re: GOL 2008 Laser Results Posted!

    I may be going out on a limb here but I believe Steve was referring to the Radar Detector testing!

    Cliff - C55

  9. #99
    Scratonicity Groupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,614

    Default Re: GOL 2008 Laser Results Posted!

    Quote Originally Posted by C55 View Post
    I may be going out on a limb here but I believe Steve was referring to the Radar Detector testing!

    Cliff - C55
    That's what surprised me the most. The laser jammer testing played out as I thought it would.

    Seeing the V1 get dominated is just something unheard of.

  10. #100
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    7,732

    Default Re: GOL 2008 Laser Results Posted!

    Good point, guys. I had not thought of including the "unofficial" testing as a part of looking at that statement from happya$$.

    Indeed, it's surprising to see the V1 getting romped on raw sensitivity, even if it is from a completely different kind of setup.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. New Results Posted!!!!
    By robcollins5 in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-08-2009, 05:41 AM
  2. CT Laser Day Results. 5/25/2008
    By PMoth in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 139
    Last Post: 06-25-2008, 05:41 PM
  3. In response-CT Laser Day Results. 5/25/2008
    By Fritter in forum Laser Jammers - General
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 06-04-2008, 07:02 AM
  4. GOL Spring Laser Jammer Test 2006 Results Posted!
    By jimbonzzz in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 06-20-2006, 08:06 PM
  5. Guys of LIDAR - Laser Jammer Test Results Posted!
    By jimbonzzz in forum Laser Jammers - General
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 11-30-2005, 05:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •