Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 49 of 49
  1. #41
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Alberta,Canada
    Posts
    106

    Default Re: LI test results

    Now I got a hankering to get the vette out to test the BEL RX75 system maybe in 4 or 5 months

  2. #42
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    7,732

    Default Re: LI test results

    Quote Originally Posted by murphy View Post
    Thanks for the compliment on the 'slade.
    She looks good, simple as that. I really like the direction Caddy has gone with their styling, of the last half-decade or so. The 'Slade is a looker.

    After you pointing me to verifying the firing of the heads I now see they respond with a very defined reply. I thought they would emit a more robust output and therefore can now understand the importance of aiming.
    The output is definitely "robust" - no need to worry about that. And yes, when you look at your LED-based system, it may seem that the LED's are "brighter," but trust me, the laser-diodes are much, much more "robust" in terms of their output power.

    But I know what you mean -> you mean that you would be able to see it better, from different angles, and that you didn't expect to only be able to see the output from "smack-on, dead-on."

    Have a look for ahmadr's "Extreme angles consideration" post, and you'll get a much better feel for why aiming/leveling is so crucial:

    http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...derations.html

    I was contemplating adding rear heads after evaluating the front performance but now may opt to pop #3 in the front center and possibly only one in the center rear?????
    I honestly don't think that three front will be necessary - and at the same time, a single rear would be a total waste....it won't do any good at all, particularly given the absolutely atrocious amount of area that they'd have to cover, with the configuration of your SUV's tail-side.

  3. #43
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Alberta,Canada
    Posts
    106

    Default Re: LI test results

    Quote Originally Posted by TSi+WRX View Post
    She looks good, simple as that. I really like the direction Caddy has gone with their styling, of the last half-decade or so. The 'Slade is a looker.



    The output is definitely "robust" - no need to worry about that. And yes, when you look at your LED-based system, it may seem that the LED's are "brighter," but trust me, the laser-diodes are much, much more "robust" in terms of their output power.

    But I know what you mean -> you mean that you would be able to see it better, from different angles, and that you didn't expect to only be able to see the output from "smack-on, dead-on."

    Have a look for ahmadr's "Extreme angles consideration" post, and you'll get a much better feel for why aiming/leveling is so crucial:

    http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...derations.html



    I honestly don't think that three front will be necessary - and at the same time, a single rear would be a total waste....it won't do any good at all, particularly given the absolutely atrocious amount of area that they'd have to cover, with the configuration of your SUV's tail-side.
    Interesting information...what would you suggest the coverage (Sq. inches) to be per head ? Anyone mount one vertical and one horizontal ?

  4. #44
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    7,732

    Default Re: LI test results

    Quote Originally Posted by murphy View Post
    ....what would you suggest the coverage (Sq. inches) to be per head ?
    That's beyond what little I know....

  5. #45
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Alberta,Canada
    Posts
    106

    Default Re: LI test results

    Quote Originally Posted by TSi+WRX View Post
    That's beyond what little I know....
    You're too modest !
    After reviewing the technical data sheet you so kindly provided on the head diodes why are they not installed (rotated) 90 degrees to provide wider dispersion on the horizontal plane instead of the vertical ?

  6. #46

    Default Re: LI test results

    Quote Originally Posted by murphy View Post
    You're too modest !
    After reviewing the technical data sheet you so kindly provided on the head diodes why are they not installed (rotated) 90 degrees to provide wider dispersion on the horizontal plane instead of the vertical ?
    Murph,

    Comprehensive testing shows that Vertically Polarized LD Emissions are more effective than horizontally.

    Cliff - LI-USA
    Last edited by Laser-InterceptorUSA; 12-21-2008 at 04:35 PM.

  7. #47
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Alberta,Canada
    Posts
    106

    Default Re: LI test results

    Quote Originally Posted by Laser-InterceptorUSA View Post
    Murph,

    Comprehensive testing shows that Vertically Polarized LD Emissions are more affective than horizontally.

    Cliff - LI-USA
    Gotcha..

  8. #48
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Alberta,Canada
    Posts
    106

    Default Re: LI test results

    Just got in from our balmy -24C. Parked the beast and drove out with the MDX and first location was at 240 meters resulting in virtually zero readings.Next to 200M and from there on in the gun was consistantly more responsive.
    I VERY MUCH believe the skewed heads to be the lack of performance and shall report back after the tweak (shall also advise just how far off they are)

    Cheers ! And Happy Holidays to you all and thanks for your all the input...nice chatting with ya

  9. #49
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    7,732

    Default Re: LI test results

    Good stuff (er....not the cold!). Glad we all got to the bottom of this one!

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. RD test results.
    By CJR238 in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 02-27-2009, 04:52 PM
  2. Results from Aug. 17th RD Test Inconsistent with the Results from the Off-Axis Test?
    By ZJamaican in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-16-2008, 10:30 AM
  3. Have the results of the SML test...............
    By CactusMan in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-12-2006, 06:31 PM
  4. Still a x50 fan regardless of GOL test results.
    By Tick Magnet in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 02-06-2006, 02:42 PM
  5. 7/16 test results?
    By Longsnowsm in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 07-23-2005, 11:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •