just got Ka with x50

[Bear-Tweezy]

it was a good detector, but i guess its time for a face lift in technology.

x2

yes X3, could this be the downfall of VR?

[Arashi666]

it was a good detector, but i guess its time for a face lift in technology.

x2

yes X3, could this be the downfall of VR?

well, they DO need to fix this rash of Ka problems first off, but a new face for the Valentines would be nice, update the display is all I ask, but i guess MIke is just so full of himself that he cant even THINK to do something like that

[AirMoore]

Nice to hear the X50 is treating you well.

[Arashi666]

Nice to hear the X50 is treating you well.

yes BACK ON TOPIC....................How do you have it setup???

[<<JAZZY>>]

Let's not forget that the 2006 GOL test has the V1 3.826 beating the X50 by 418 feet so V1 still beats the X50 on that frequency.

Great "filtering" to Escort and Bel users means less range to V1 users.

[Arashi666]

Let's not forget that the 2006 GOL test has the V1 3.826 beating the X50 by 418 feet so V1 still beats the X50 on that frequency.

Great "filtering" to Escort and Bel users means less range to V1 users.

well that was a 3.826.................. i was refering to the horror stories I read every day about the 3.851s

[Bear-Tweezy]

Let's not forget that the 2006 GOL test has the V1 3.826 beating the X50 by 418 feet so V1 still beats the X50 on that frequency.

Great "filtering" to Escort and Bel users means less range to V1 users.

well that was a 3.826.................. i was refering to the horror stories I read every day about the 3.851s

but that 418 feet could be reversed exactly with another V1 and say another X50 than the two tested

[<<JAZZY>>]

Let's not forget that the 2006 GOL test has the V1 3.826 beating the X50 by 418 feet so V1 still beats the X50 on that frequency.

Great "filtering" to Escort and Bel users means less range to V1 users.

well that was a 3.826.................. i was refering to the horror stories I read every day about the 3.851s

but that 418 feet could be reversed exactly with another V1 and say another X50 than the two tested

I chose the best V1 and the best X50 from the 2006 test and the difference was 418 feet.

If I chose the worst V1 in the 2006 test and the best X50 from 2006, the difference is 345 feet so either way the V1 owns the X50 on that frequency.

Even if you go to the 2005 GOL test, the V1 beats the X50 by 411 feet.

[Bear-Tweezy]

Let's not forget that the 2006 GOL test has the V1 3.826 beating the X50 by 418 feet so V1 still beats the X50 on that frequency.

Great "filtering" to Escort and Bel users means less range to V1 users.

well that was a 3.826.................. i was refering to the horror stories I read every day about the 3.851s

but that 418 feet could be reversed exactly with another V1 and say another X50 than the two tested

I chose the best V1 and the best X50 from the 2006 test and the difference was 418 feet.

If I chose the worst V1 in the 2006 test and the best X50 from 2006, the difference is 345 feet so either way the V1 owns the X50 on that frequency.

Even if you go to the 2005 GOL test, the V1 beats the X50 by 411 feet.

Well aometimes you need to look outside the box and look at other tests too :wink:

[<<JAZZY>>]

What test would that be.....radartest.com.