Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 40 of 40
  1. #31
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles Area
    Posts
    13,879

    Default Re: 9500i vs. 9500ix

    Quote Originally Posted by TSi+WRX View Post
    ^ We're all human.

    Yes, occasionally, I ride the FailBus, too.

    And as many of our fellow brothers' confessions have shown, this is all too possible, no matter what the detector used.

    But yes, growing complacent with the V1 is potentially the BIGGEST red-flag that anyone can throw. It's a definite way direct to a ticket.

    Still, I don't really consider this a fault of the detector - but rather, the end user.

    It would be, on my scale of things, akin to ignoring CJR's "Risk Scenarios," for usage of TrueLock.
    This is of course true, but the root cause of this is a RD that "cries wolf" all the time. When either of my 9500's alerts, I listen. Truelock removes this complacency.

  2. #32
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    7,732

    Default Re: 9500i vs. 9500ix

    ^ I think that's a different way of looking at it.....or rather, that it requires fundamentally different thinking, when you're using an "instrument of war" like the V1, instead.

    I think that with the V1, you can't really say it's "crying wolf." It's simply reporting all that it sees (or thinks it sees).

    It's not really lying to you - it's just flooding you with information.

    And as the end gatekeeper, you've got to make the proper tactical assessments.

  3. #33

    Arrow Re: 9500i vs. 9500ix

    Quote Originally Posted by 335kid View Post
    I just ditched my V1 [too many falses] for the 9500i. Florida doesn't have speed cameras or red light cameras so is there any other reason I need an ix?

    Florida Red Light Cameras Map

  4. #34
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    11,015

    Default Re: 9500i vs. 9500ix

    Well, looks like there are RLC's in Florida, though it depends on your area... great site BPFLOYD. The fact is: They are becoming more and more common (like laser) as time goes on.

  5. #35
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    2,306

    Default Re: 9500i vs. 9500ix

    I'm 17 and have the 9500ix. You'll like the 9500i. It is a quality radar detector with excellent sensitivity and minimal falses.

  6. #36
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Driving the United Socialist States of North America
    Posts
    584

    Default Re: 9500i vs. 9500ix

    I have been considering a better more potent radar detector than the RX65, I thought the new GX65 would be the way to go. The more posts I read , I'm think'in that the 9500ix would be the way to go.

    Whistler1

  7. #37
    Stealthed Like a B-2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Eastern, VA
    Posts
    1,813

    Default Re: 9500i vs. 9500ix

    Quote Originally Posted by Whistler1 View Post
    I have been considering a better more potent radar detector than the RX65, I thought the new GX65 would be the way to go. The more posts I read , I'm think'in that the 9500ix would be the way to go.

    Whistler1
    Well the GX65 is not the way to go for a GPS enabled detector because the reason I have stated many times and recently has been proven. Though Beltronics and Escort are the same company Beltronics is not up to date with everything. Escort is a much better company in terms of Customer service, Reliability, Products, Updates (Key), speedyness (with everything even emails), etc.

    Beltronics just falls behind, I knew this would happen and it is much apperent with the GX65.

    But whistler, what do you mean by a more potent radar detector. Your not going to get more performance, and all you'll be purchasing is the GPS capabilites. Which are worth it but not when you have a RX-65 and your not getting any other benifits.

    Honestly, save up for a good Laser Jammer or what I would do get the 9500ci. Honestly Im having more and more faith in the 9500ci. I reccommend it to anybody now because its everything that you possibly could want in a detector.

    Every time I see a video that if it wasn't for the sensitivity of the ci the person would have gotten a ticket it makes me more and more a firm believer in it. Yes you don't have arrows but w/e, I'd much rather be saved from an I/O attack than have arrows.

    And the 9500ci and STI-R are the only detectors that I feel can give you the closest to 100% reliabilty in all situations.

    I mean think about it, all the detectors currently besides the STI and CI are out-of-date, the Radar Manufacture's and Law Enforcement officers have caught up with us. Especially with the use of I/O and the use of the Kustom Golden Eagle 35.5 radar band that utilizes the narrow radar beam and the new low powered 34.7 Stalker. 35.5 utilized with CHP off-ramp tactic is deadly straight deadly and the V1 is the only handheld that can be even close to some protection and in some situations your looking at a 1-2 second alert maybe.

    The detectors need more raw detection but is not possible because it will be like the Valentine 1 but worse in the city. Escorts GPS technology fixed this and is using it pretty damn well.

  8. #38
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SoCal - OC Style
    Posts
    2,478

    Default Re: 9500i vs. 9500ix

    Quote Originally Posted by BPFLOYD View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by AirMoore View Post
    Well, looks like there are RLC's in Florida, though it depends on your area... great site BPFLOYD.
    Don't trust Photoenforced.com too much ... it shows California as having 47 speed cameras, when in fact we have none.

  9. #39
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    7,732

    Default Re: 9500i vs. 9500ix

    ^ +1.

    I'd once e-mailed a reference from Photoenforced over to Ally (at Cheetah/Trinity) - turns out that it (the Photoenforced data)was very out-dated.

  10. #40
    Almost Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    1,963

    Default Re: 9500i vs. 9500ix

    Quote Originally Posted by djrams80 View Post
    This is of course true, but the root cause of this is a RD that "cries wolf" all the time. When either of my 9500's alerts, I listen. Truelock removes this complacency.
    true. since owning a V1 during my 30day trial I can confirm the chatter can make you oblivious at times. especially if you're using a muted volume.
    I love both detectors though for their own reasons, but this post is making pushing me back towards the Escort side. I cant decide!
    Last edited by RadarKid; 12-04-2008 at 09:58 AM.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. 9500i -> 9500ix Upgrade
    By GoHawks63 in forum Escort
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-28-2011, 09:33 PM
  2. 9500ix over 9500i
    By consultant in forum Escort
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-16-2009, 10:56 PM
  3. Keep 9500i or buy 9500ix?
    By BLKCMY00 in forum Escort
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 05-21-2009, 11:59 AM
  4. 9500i the same as 9500ix?
    By stano0098 in forum Escort
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-12-2009, 08:54 AM
  5. 9500i or 9500ix?
    By category4 in forum Escort
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 07-18-2008, 05:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •