REDLINE, V1, X50, STi Testing VIDEO.

[thestaton]

What information are those graphs trying to show?

[rocky2]

What information are those graphs trying to show?

Sorry, I guess the legend would be helpful. ( I added it to the previous post) I would just post the link to the Veil guys site but I am afraid it would break some of the rules. If you go to his site the Belscorts did just as good if not better, and of course the V1 was the best.

[Monoxcide]

I'm aware that being alerted prior to a laser trap is near impossible. But if you market something that says:

"Next Gen Laser Detection
RedLine's multiple laser sensors are strategically positioned to detect even the smallest amount of laser light, including off-axis signals."

I would expect it to alert to most legitimate laser encounters / sources. The V1 has proven to do this and is used commonly along side a jammer. I was just curious if this claim can be backed up or not. If so, then they are trying to market a more expensive, sometimes better on K and Ka band, directionless radar detector.

[Obsidian]

I'm aware that being alerted prior to a laser trap is near impossible. But if you market something that says:

"Next Gen Laser Detection
RedLine's multiple laser sensors are strategically positioned to detect even the smallest amount of laser light, including off-axis signals."

I would expect it to alert to most legitimate laser encounters / sources. The V1 has proven to do this and is used commonly along side a jammer. I was just curious if this claim can be backed up or not. If so, then they are trying to market a more expensive, sometimes better on K and Ka band, directionless radar detector.

Escort marketing is a joke. See the spoiler in my sig for some of their Redline hype.

They just hired a new Marketing VP yesterday ... got him from General Motors, LOL.

[Virion]

I'm aware that being alerted prior to a laser trap is near impossible. But if you market something that says:

"Next Gen Laser Detection
RedLine's multiple laser sensors are strategically positioned to detect even the smallest amount of laser light, including off-axis signals."

I would expect it to alert to most legitimate laser encounters / sources. The V1 has proven to do this and is used commonly along side a jammer. I was just curious if this claim can be backed up or not. If so, then they are trying to market a more expensive, sometimes better on K and Ka band, directionless radar detector.

Escort marketing is a joke. See the spoiler in my sig for some of their Redline hype.

They just hired a new Marketing VP yesterday ... got him from General Motors, LOL.

It's very easy to tear apart many of the remarks on the Valentine Research website as well. Each company needs to market their products. Each can be misleading without being untruthful.

Let's not forget how many times Valentine refused to acknowledge "Pop" as a legitimate feature. Once they finally added the feature they stated how important it is.

[rocky2]

I'm aware that being alerted prior to a laser trap is near impossible. But if you market something that says:

"Next Gen Laser Detection
RedLine's multiple laser sensors are strategically positioned to detect even the smallest amount of laser light, including off-axis signals."

I would expect it to alert to most legitimate laser encounters / sources. The V1 has proven to do this and is used commonly along side a jammer. I was just curious if this claim can be backed up or not. If so, then they are trying to market a more expensive, sometimes better on K and Ka band, directionless radar detector.

Escort marketing is a joke. See the spoiler in my sig for some of their Redline hype.

They just hired a new Marketing VP yesterday ... got him from General Motors, LOL.

It's very easy to tear apart many of the remarks on the Valentine Research website as well. Each company needs to market their products. Each can be misleading without being untruthful.

Let's not forget how many times Valentine refused to acknowledge "Pop" as a legitimate feature. Once they finally added the feature they stated how important it is.

I always thought this picture on the site was funny, in that situation no matter what RD you have you are getting a ticket. And why does the radar stop when it hits the 360 protection zone, wish my V1 would do that. Both companies have some goofy marketing.

[venom400]

The ramp up on V1 is flawless , the rest go off like a 12 year old at the sight of a cheerleader.

[v1user]

The ramp up on V1 is flawless , the rest go off like JDS at the sight of a 12 year old cheerleader.

Fixed.

I wish he was still on here.

[ReVeaL]

Personally,
I read & read & read this thread.

All I'm hearing is that over 9/10th of the post on this thread concerning
Redline is bias towards V1. I'm not hearing anything unbias towards Redline
detector. Even though, 2 different excellent reviewers.
(Namely Radar Roy and SpeedTraphunter) reviewed in there situations that
Redline out performed V1 hands down.

Now, Fact 1
These videos shows the exact same route.
Fact 2 how do we know that whether this person acknowledges it or not intentionally pushed the same route.

You get in the car, and hook up the detectors. Then you find a point
where the V1 is beating the Redline indefinitely. Then you go on and video tape
this incident. Then decide to show the public this view point.

All I'm seeing is the exact same ride through.
Now, there are a ton of V1 supporters on this forum that I notice.
This is fine, but there comes a time that one should be neutral and fair.

I'm not seeing this within these threads even though 1 Expert Professional
whom opinion I value (Radar Roy)
&
another whom seem to be very accurate as well
(SpeedTraphunter)

In both of there videos they both acknowledge the Redline out perform V1.

This is what I'm really saying here. This is my most important line of this
whole point. Why not be fair, and let more Redline Vs V1 Tapes come to the forefront. Then review them fairly against one another.
NOT on the same piece of Landmark doing the same route over and over again.
That is not a fair review.
That is like Radar Roy reviewing 1 of the few times V1 alerted over the Redline, and then say. Hey, let me video tape it and run this route several more times on tape. This one tape proves nothing to me because there are 2 to 3 other
reviewers where the Redline has beaten V1 Detector.

Now if you all wish to use the regular civilians reviewers find with me.
Show me the proof, facts, and tapes of Redline & V1.
Not going around the same route over and over again, but many many
streets, different Highways, areas, forest, plains, mountains and States,.

ReVeaL

[<<JAZZY>>]

Personally,
I read & read & read this thread.

All I'm hearing is that over 9/10th of the post on this thread concerning
Redline is bias towards V1. I'm not hearing anything unbias towards Redline
detector. Even though, 2 different excellent reviewers.
(Namely Radar Roy and Speedhunter) reviewed in there situations that
Redline out performed V1 hands down.

Now, Fact 1
These videos shows the exact same route.
Fact 2 how do we know that whether this person acknowledges it or not intentionally pushed the same route.

You get in the car, and hook up the detectors. Then you find a point
where the V1 is beating the Redline indefinitely. Then you go on and video tape
this incident. Then decide to show the public this view point.

All I'm seeing is the exact same ride through.
Now, there are a ton of V1 supporters on this forum that I notice.
This is fine, but there comes a time that one should be neutral and fair.

I'm not seeing this within these threads even though 1 Expert Professional
whom opinion I value (Radar Roy)
&
another whom seem to be very accurate as well
(Speedhunter)

In both of there videos they both acknowledge the Redline out perform V1.

This is what I'm really saying here. This is my most important line of this
whole point. Why not be fair, and let more Redline Vs V1 Tapes come to the forefront. Then review them fairly against one another.
NOT on the same piece of Landmark doing the same route over and over again.
That is not a fair review.
That is like Radar Roy reviewing 1 of the few times V1 alerted over the Redline, and then say. Hey, let me video tape it and run this route several more times on tape. This one tape proves nothing to me because there are 2 to 3 other
reviewers where the Redline has beaten V1 Detector.

Now if you all wish to use the regular civilians reviewers find with me.
Show me the proof, facts, and tapes of Redline & V1.
Not going around the same route over and over again, but many many
streets, different Highways, areas, forest, plains, mountains and States,.

ReVeaL

Radar Roy is a great guy but why would he want to show the V1 beating Bels and Escorts when he doesn't sell the V1? I believe that the VeilGuy was given a Redline before they were even released so it could have been juiced or the cream of the crop off of the assembly line at Escort. You are a newbie and you have yet to realize that Bel and Escort usually talk alot of crap but don't back it up with performance.

They claimed that the Escort 8500 was better than the V1...not true...the Escort 8500 X50 had 50&#37; better blah blah than the V1...not true...the Escort 9500i and Escort 9500ix are the latest technological GPS blah blabbity blah...not better than the V1. Here comes the Redline with turbocharged, supercharged, Charles In Charge, nitrous oxide injected, hyper speed technology to capture cops without radar on...not true as usual so you should understand why people back the V1 because it has been #1 since 1992.

If you don't believe the respected forum members then that is your problem. Go out and buy a V1 and Redline and experience the Escort QT fail and watch the V1 perform on the same level as the Redline for $100 cheaper and it comes with arrows and a rear radar antenna.