Thinking about the Li and Truspeed again

[focalcivic]

Ok, I have heard through the grapevine that the LI will jam the truspeed center mass shots (this is not Roys orig testing I am referring to, but sometimes the grapevine can have rotten grapes, so this is no 100%), but has problems with headlight or say mirror shots with PT's. A simple solution might be to add Veil G4, until you get the CPU upgrade or just test with Veil G4 and LI might be ok.

[noTe]

I think once Ivan gets the gun and we update our units, we shouldn't have to worry about it. I'm sure Cliff is working on it because over on the LI forum there is already a discussion about it.

[happya$$]

do not worry that gun will not be a problem for LI

[crazyVOLVOrob]

The updated CPU with LTi Truspeed jamming technology will be available in the near future. The new CPUs are just about to be shipped to Cliff.

If you are worried with Just the LTi Truspeed go with the Escort Zr4. So far we can only besure that there are 500 truspeeds in the USA but there are plenty of other guns in the USA in a much larger number that should be your main worry. Unless your state exclusively uses one type of gun, most don't, do not stress over one gun

[Suf Daddy]

The specs (that they publish) never specify the pulse rate.

They do imply with a narrower 2.5 milliradian (vs. 3 milliradian) focus of LIDAR, that the beam spread will be less/smaller "comparatively" and that it will be a similar problem to jam the "closer" it gets, because the beam will be smaller/tighter.

So if everything else is the same, your jammer head placement will be more critical as it will have to cloak the width of the vehicle against a narrower beam.

I'd approach it as working from 400 feet in with a bigger (same pulse rate) LIDAR gun.......

Anyone have the pps on the TruSpeed?

-Suf

[focalcivic]

The specs (that they publish) never specify the pulse rate.

They do imply with a narrower 2.5 milliradian (vs. 3 milliradian) focus of LIDAR, that the beam spread will be less/smaller "comparatively" and that it will be a similar problem to jam the "closer" it gets, because the beam will be smaller/tighter.

So if everything else is the same, your jammer head placement will be more critical as it will have to cloak the width of the vehicle against a narrower beam.

I'd approach it as working from 400 feet in with a bigger (same pulse rate) LIDAR gun.......

Anyone have the pps on the TruSpeed?

-Suf

Surf, that makes me agree with you about head placement is important like you said, say for instance you get CM shot and the heads are center mounted so you will get a detection and then a transmitted jam signal. As for headlight shots the beam is narrower so the current LI is having more issues with it. I think current LI owners will be ok if they have good head placement for now, and then if they decide to get the CPU updgrade in the future.

[Laser-InterceptorUSA]

do not worry that gun will not be a problem for LI

This concern about the new LTI TruSpeed being a problem for LI has been addressed successfully by Team LI. More info. will follow shortly but everyone can breath easy now.

Cliff - C55

[joeg]

This concern about the new LTI TruSpeed being a problem for LI has been addressed successfully by Team LI. More info. will follow shortly but everyone can breath easy now.

Cliff - C55

I really like the fact that you guys don't mess around. When I first joined this forum, I was weary of the LI because of the Customer Service issues that you were working on ironing out. Now that LI has taken the initiative to quickly tackle a possible upcoming problem and it appears that the customer service has greatly improved, I am seriously considering going with LI. Now for some tests to see if this fix will work. If LI comes through, I'm sold.

[hockey005]

joeg

LI does not play any games lol they are for real and it works trust me

[muledoe1]

when is the tru speed due for release? and also what states will be equipped with em?