[Video] Anti-laser claims this and Staton claims that

[JTW]

This video clearly shows how the anti-laser was supposed to perform on a mid sized car and we finally have proof of this. The cover-up people dont' want you to see this video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvrddlJ2d9A

JTW

[thestaton]

good video, I stand corrected. However the DelSol in the test is a 2 door coupe not a mid size car.

and they did do head on shots so nothing really new. head on shot with any car and a good jammer will JTG.

[JTW]

good video, I stand corrected. However the DelSol in the test is a 2 door coupe not a mid size car.

and they did do head on shots so nothing really new. head on shot with any car and a good jammer will JTG.

And I'll agree the DelSol isn't a mid sized sedan of course.

On thing I didn't mention in the video was the jammer was placed under a huge retroreflective license plate, the same spot stealthjamal had his jammer. Jamal had major punch through's as well and it was in the same spot as the manufactures car.

On another note remember how the toyota camry had the jammer over the license plate, a plate half the size of teh euro plate on the del sol video. Can we at least come to a compromise that the anti-laser retail units aren't consistant.

JTW

[ynoskds]

STATON IS BUSTED.

[againstme!]

and the $**** has hit the fan. :twisted:

[amoney]

Can we at least come to a compromise that the anti-laser retail units aren't consistant.

JTW

I agree, AntiLaser was misleading with what I assume is selective demo video, even go.mouse/JTW was able to get JTG results one time, that was less angle and streight head shot. One head is not enough, GOL did show dual head units cover much better but still not close to being perfect.

[Suf Daddy]

Is it conincidence that my system CRASHED HARD with fatal like memory dump errors when I tried to watch it past Go Mouse talking about the test results in the BC parking lot?

I'll try and watch again, but if I don't post for a few days its because my system CRASHED again watching this "movie"......................

Back to your regularly scheduled program..........

-Suf Daddy

[Suf Daddy]

Okay saw the whole thing.

No more drama........

------------------------------------

The AL 6 video there (red del sol) and the AL ver 6.5 video with the black BMW are two different videos.

Clarification should be made ( I guess by Stanton) which of the "6" videos he is refferring to.

Not supporting either side here..............

I wonder about the "Reflective plate" we see in the Al videos where the license plate goes ........................................ like just HOW reflective is it?

-Suf Daddy

[Suf Daddy]

Does somebody have a zoomed in photo of the GoMouse AL transponder location above the plate. I'd like to see it again up close (pref from the side angle) to make a comment about it and possible punch through results......

-Suf Daddy

<<<<< S N I P >>>>
On another note remember how the toyota camry had the jammer over the license plate, a plate half the size of teh euro plate on the del sol video. Can we at least come to a compromise that the anti-laser retail units aren't consistant.

JTW

[thestaton]

I think with any jammer on any day you can get any results you want if you work hard enough. Just so its not a laser stick from RMR The DELSOL in that video does not represent an American Mid Size car. I don’t know much about Croatia but I can tell you I have been to Spain, Germany, Italy, Turkey, Russia, Japan, Iceland, and about 15 more and most of the cars are those small boxy, very good on gas cars. When we went to the Rock of Gibraltar we rented a mid size car in Spain. That sucker was smaller than a 2 door honda civic found here in the States. So different countries have different meanings for things.

Also, its all about marketing. Every company in the world is guilty of it you want to show the best side of your product. On the day of the DelSol testing there could of been punch throughs but those where not shown. However being it was a head on shot I'm sure the results are pretty valid for that scenario.

We need to compare Apples to Apples. The delsol is very well rounded car, with tiny headlights. I know nothing about the reflective plate they used but is it possible our plates in the States are better?

Every testing situation, with every variable can always favor one thing or the other. In the go.mouse test I really think the tripod, front plate, headlights, and the angle really hurt the performance.

And I think with any single head on a car when you start to make the angles bigger its going to do horrible. For the Delsol they where doing a head on shot so we dont know what would of happened if they had moved out farther from the road.

Imagine a single head Lidatek on his car, if you go off more than a few degrees the punch throughs are going to be immediate.

I mean who is to say that if you had thrown some VEIL on that sucker and a laser shield it might of did better?

At the end of the day instead of arguing with each other we should think of ways to make what we have better. Find ways to help the people who have spent there money get the most out of it.

For the next go.mouse test why not try and put a laser shield on the plate and angle it down. Throw some VEIL on the headlights, and try different speeds 35mph / 65mph. Try the Tripod try using manual aim. Then do a test where you start at 2000FT, then at the gun operators choice shoot the car. See if the driver has sufficient time to slow down.

Its just a theory of mine but with a single diode setup compared to a dual you are eventually going to get punch through the greater the punch through. Until a jammer company can find a way to mount there diodes with one pointing forward, and 2 off to the sides I don’t see a 1 head system working for JTG's. However if it gives you time to slow down then other than for bragging rights who cares? At the end of the day when you drive home ticket free and have beat the revenue system that is what counts.

*group hug*


8)