|
|
Well for me I would ask, do you plan on buying the other one later? If so then you should get the jammer now, since it has the ability to pay off more over time, and then get the tint when you save up some more money. Of course, if you really only want to get one in the near future then you'll have to decide.
huper optik is the best
i was going to get it for the passat but i got something else
i say go for the tint
there seems to be so much drama in the laser jammer world... wait for it to calm down
Tough choice..... :?
I would have to agree hereOriginally Posted by f_399
Regaurdless of how much I support the DEF2 I say the tint...
give it another month so you can get the whole picture!
Wont metallic tint screw with my navigation system and my radar reception?
Thosands of cars on the road with tint, cheap tint at that, and certainly no issues with navigational equipment, as for RD, your main concern is the front, so no worries there, as far as the effects of the tint on the back window, sure it is not advisable, but it should not make that big of a difference if ANY measurable difference at that unless you have a V1, then you may have some bigger issues.
Really cost wise, the tint is nothing in price unless your getting ripped, at most you should pay is $150 for good tint (lifetime warranty from the manufacture). Defenetly get the tint and go on from there.
NO, i run 2 GPs units in my car incl Navigation and I have NEVER had a problem!
i would stay away from metalic
and your theory behind that is??
Honda, actually says to not use metallic on their cars equipped with navi.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks