Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    7,732

    Default Re: Laser Mimics EXTREMELY Sensitive

    ^ Ah, but notice happya$$'s stipulations, on what he saw of the performance.

    It's sensitive, no doubt.

    And it does well in "head-on" scenarios.

    But he was able to elicit the PTs by just panning to weak-points, further away from the heads.

    So again, we've got the same considerations that make for "a good jammer" -->

    (1)

    It's gotta detect well. As we've seen of IRCMUSA's original and then-groundbreaking IR-videos, without being able to "see" the threat, the jammer simply can't respond properly.

    Clearly, this is not a problem for the Mimic - nor, say, the ZR4, as demonstrated by Cbr and ELVATO's IR-video.

    (2)

    It's gotta perform well, not just on-axis, when the LIDAR beam is pointed directly at it, but also when even the most outer edges of the vehicle's profile - and hardpoints - are being probed.

    (3)

    It's gotta have the proper algorithm to handle the threats that it's going to face.


    ---

    Unless a jammer fits all of these criteria, it's gonna be subject to failure.

    Does this mean that the jammer can't perform under real-world circumstances?

    No, not necessarily.

    I think that, in a way, "good enough," for many, is just that.

    However, I do think that any of these risk factors play a HUGE part in the problems that can arise when the encounter scenario becomes less-than-favorable.

  2. #12

    Default Re: Laser Mimics EXTREMELY Sensitive

    Quote Originally Posted by happya$$ View Post
    No I am being dead serious for once. I know that it is hard to believe especially when one sees how cheaply built these things are
    I believe you since you have tried just about every jammer on the market. Interestingly, a side test was quickly requested by Blinder at SML this year, just to see if the Blinders could detect laser over a slight hill. I believe we were at the 2500 foot cone and only had to drive forward by two hundred feet to crest the very slight hill. Blinder requested a continuous laser shot as he crested the hill. He got a solid alert as soon as his heads began to clear the hill and had line-of-sight. So I figured, what the hell, and requested to try the same thing with the ZR4. I had the exact same results with the ZR4.

    The only thing I can say is that the better laser jammers obviously are very sensitive to laser -- far more sensitive than the average radar detector's single laser module even when laser is pointing straight at the radar detector.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. nonX50 more sensitive to laser than X50?
    By ActiveKAjam in forum Escort
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-17-2008, 08:53 PM
  2. I WAS extremely happy with my RX-65
    By Dachief in forum Beltronics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-06-2006, 03:59 PM
  3. RX 65 KA BAND SENSITIVE TO LASER
    By cavili in forum Beltronics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-16-2006, 10:44 AM
  4. Super laser sensitive!
    By sethy in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 08-11-2005, 10:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •