Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30
  1. #21
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    6,805

    Default

    So does that talk of tracking history mean they won't be using POP?
    If I'm passing you on the right, YOU are in the wrong lane!

    If speed kills, how come I'm still alive?

    Active Countermeasures: V1 3.858, Escort Redline, Beltronics STi-R+, LI Dual 7.1x CPU/8.7 Heads (front)
    Other/Backup Countermeasures: V1 3.813 (loaned to friend), Beltronics Pro RX65 M4 6.3
    Vehicle: 2002 Audi A4 1.8T Quattro
    LEO Toys: Kustom Pro Laser II & III
    Encounters/Saves August 2011: Radar 3/1, Laser 0/0


  2. #22
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Northern Jersey
    Posts
    131

    Default

    uh oh, im scared now.... how is it useful with the tracking history? shouldnt they still follow up the POP hit with a normal burst of instant on?

  3. #23
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Southern MA
    Posts
    10,127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kap1027
    shouldnt they still follow up the POP hit with a normal burst of instant on?
    They should but cops are sneaky and most likely won't do that

    Spoiler: show

    Radar Detectors-V1 & BEL v995
    Laser Jammer-Laser Interceptor Quad
    GPS Camera Locator-Cheetah C100
    GPS Nav-Garmin nuvi w/Trapster
    CB Radio-Galaxy DX-949 w/Wilson 500
    Scanner-RS Pro-96

  4. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    2,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thestaton
    is the Z series the ones that have pop built in? and have proven to be inaccurate?

    staton
    I would like to see proof the Z POP is not accurate from a source other than Mike V. I believe Mike is right, however it would be nice to have another credible source to confirm this.

  5. #25
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    2,357

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JammerTests Webmaster
    I would like to see proof the Z POP is not accurate from a source other than Mike V. I believe Mike is right, however it would be nice to have another credible source to confirm this.
    I think that his theory is correct but I highly doubt that the errors in practice are nearly as high as he speculates. (I've hit something like 400mph in that little POP game they have on the site.) How could a company actually put something like that into production?

  6. #26
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    VA & NJ
    Posts
    195

    Default

    It's So easy, in fact one company alerady exists! Rocky mountain radar

  7. #27
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    593

    Default

    Just a follow up on my email to Sgt. Ritter of the NJSP. Yesterday I was travelling the NJ turnpike heading north. Once I got past exit 10 or so, most of the cruisers were no longer bearing the recognizable K-55 X band antenna. From what I could see the radar antenna and display were compacted on the dash between the windshield and steering wheel.

    I decided to email Sgt. Ritter again this morning. He replied back already:

    As we spoke back then, you are correct. It will take some time. Right
    now the Turnpike is in a testing stage and will have both Stalker and
    B-III out there. The Traffic Bureau is also collecting data for a
    private entity to read. After all types of weathers and conditions are
    tested and the results are made, we will then determine what
    specifications are required and bidding will begin.

    This process is expected to take some time yet, but we are confident
    that it will be the best for the motoring public.

    As before, if there is anything else I can do for you do not hesitate
    to contact me.

    Sgt. Stephen L. Ritter #5509
    Administrative Officer
    Traffic Bureau
    609-882-2000 Ext. 2238

    >>> "" <midd33@iwon.com> 03/15/07 10:08 AM >>>





    Sir,



    You may or may not remember our correspondence with each other from
    almost 2 years ago so I included it with this email. Yesterday was my
    first journey to northern new jersey in a few years. After exit 10 on
    the Turnpike, I had a few cruisers go by me. I couldn't help but
    noticing the absence of the easily recognizable MPH K-55 antenna that
    has been accustomed to NJSP vehicles for so many years. At first I
    couldn't notice anything. However as a few more passed by, I did notice
    a small antenna and panel on the dash in front of the steering wheel.
    I'm assuming these are one of the newer units you previously discussed
    with me in 2005. I was just curious if both the Stalker and MPH Bee III
    are being used or was one unit chosen over the other?



    The most intriguing part of all this was that on my return heading
    south, it seemed that after exit 10 maybe even 8, I noticed the
    reemergence of the K-55 Antenna in the police vehicles. So I guess you
    were right when you said it would take some time, even years for a
    complete transition.



    Once again, I thank you for your time for reading this.

  8. #28
    Experienced
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Jersey/Saratoga NY
    Posts
    317

    Default

    Thats very interesting? K-band? Keep us posted this is important.

  9. #29
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Land of Lincoln
    Posts
    461

    Default

    :?

    Hello,

    If i remember right, you cannot lock a speed in via pop? Jimbonzz you have played with one...enlight us lowly peasants. LOL

    Take care,

    Spinner

  10. #30

    Default

    Oh man. As long as it doesn't get below Exit 8 :shock:

    Keep the K-band, POP, and laser up above I-195! It's WAY more congested up there... that's where you need it... yeah... so leave us south jersians alone! haha

    Though best solution is don't waste taxpayer's money on more expensive, unnecessary RADAR technology upgrades.

    USE THE MONEY TO FIX ALL THE F'ING POT-HOLES THAT CONTINUE TO RUIN OUR SUSPENSIONS AND WHEELS YEAR-ROUND!

    It's ridiculous that all this money gets allocated to upgrade radar-units when the state can't even keep the roadways in safe operating condition! Get your priorities straight!

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. PA State Police - New Radar Units?
    By AFirefighter in forum Local & Regional Info
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 07-17-2012, 09:21 AM
  2. NH State Police - Radar or Laser?
    By polo in forum Local & Regional Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-02-2010, 06:03 PM
  3. MI State police using stationary radar.
    By proudNMAmember in forum News Stories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-08-2007, 02:08 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •