Attorney Takes on Red Light Cameras

**outrun** · 12-17-2008, 09:29 PM

Dallas judge reaffirms that red-light camera firm needs license | WFAA.com | Latest News

**Lucky225** · 12-17-2008, 09:35 PM

Originally Posted by outrun

Dallas judge reaffirms that red-light camera firm needs license | WFAA.com | Latest News

I like this judge someone appoint him to the appellate courts!

**Stealth Stalker** · 12-17-2008, 09:49 PM

pwn3d again.

Strike 2.

**YTCD** · 12-17-2008, 09:57 PM

Pawwwownd again x3!!!!

Lol, thats so funny

**Maestro** · 12-18-2008, 07:52 AM

hey time to run some RLC and go to court and hand the judge that case.

Big questions does this also apply to RCL which are civil offense verse criminal. Remember the guy who fought his ticket in TX a while back and won, his was more of a civil matter and her did not have hearing with judge but with the company operating the cameras.

How does a decision like this affect those operations.

**Lucky225** · 12-18-2008, 01:47 PM

Originally Posted by Maestro

hey time to run some RLC and go to court and hand the judge that case.

Big questions does this also apply to RCL which are civil offense verse criminal. Remember the guy who fought his ticket in TX a while back and won, his was more of a civil matter and her did not have hearing with judge but with the company operating the cameras.

How does a decision like this affect those operations.

ALL RLC violations in TX are civil in nature, but the occupations code for private investigation says any company that collects evidence that will be used in ANY court (civil or criminal) must have a license.