Superprotector Visibility & Photo Spray application

**nvr2fast** · 06-10-2005, 08:46 PM

Originally Posted by RacerX

Regis,
then again you could be right. :!:
My "reasoning" ( well okay "assumption") was that the seperate photo radar blocker obscures the plate, and the redlight camera blocker reflects back the flash. You could be right in that this one just blocks it from top to bottom at an angle, which means a coat of Veil could be an option, although it may like you said draw too much attention.

nvr2fast,
Thanks.

On my truck with the bumper blocking the far side, it goes from blocking one side, then it starts to block both, then it looks like it starts to unblock both like jbird said, but i can't say for sure since the plate sits in my bumper.

Do you mean it must be very sideways before it unblocks (like almost 80-90 degrees, almost parallel with the plate)?

**RacerX** · 06-10-2005, 11:20 PM

On mine yes.
I think even without the bumper, you would almost be parallel before it would unblock.
So at least the way i have it mounted, once you get to that angle that starts to block, you basically won't see the entire plate again, unless maybe you were right at the bumper looking down.

**Flitsservice.nl** · 08-21-2005, 09:30 AM

Just a request: Could you film this at about 20 degree angle on your car, where as 0 is straight ahead and then 20 to the left. That is the angle photoradar is using. What I see on your film is an angle of about 45 degree and the one at about 20 degree your license is clearly visible.

**thestaton** · 08-26-2005, 11:53 AM

hrm... interesting is 20 degrees something that was agreed on by a certain organization? I mean for instance here in Dover we have all kinds of redlight cameras. should I assume those are 20 degrees or how can you tell? thanks for the help!

I had the super protector on my car but got pulled in MD by a prick ass cop who wrote me a 40 dollar ticket. I have taken it off for the time being but i'm still tempted to put it back on. Being its not a moving violation...

**Regis** · 08-26-2005, 06:16 PM

Just curious, but what was the charge you were ticketed on?

**TheGame** · 08-26-2005, 06:23 PM

Considering the long-term insurance cost of a moving violation I'd rather have a $40 ticket every month than one speeding ticket a year....

**thestaton** · 08-27-2005, 08:28 AM

"failure to maintain & fasten veh reg plate in visible position" is what the cop wrote me up for. but it was easy to get out of

**kaledrr** · 08-27-2005, 08:07 PM

does this cover aginst the Digital camera?

**Regis** · 08-28-2005, 11:25 PM

Yes, sounds to me like your plate was still very visible and that charge would be easily beatable. They just like to harass no doubt!

My VF2 photo jammer is on the way, looking forward to that!

**Flitsservice.nl** · 09-07-2005, 03:01 PM

Originally Posted by thestaton

hrm... interesting is 20 degrees something that was agreed on by a certain organization? I mean for instance here in Dover we have all kinds of redlight cameras. should I assume those are 20 degrees or how can you tell? thanks for the help!

I had the super protector on my car but got pulled in MD by a prick *BEEP* cop who wrote me a 40 dollar ticket. I have taken it off for the time being but i'm still tempted to put it back on. Being its not a moving violation...

Red light photo's don't use radar, so there is no set angle. It just needs to show the red light and the car. They use induction loops in the road to trigger the camera and they can nmeasure speed.

all photoradar are at about 20 degree angle