Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 66
  1. #21
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Glencoe, Illinois
    Posts
    1,623

    Default

    carbon is there anything besides ka range and immediacy of response before option 6 off that the rx65 has on the v1???

  2. #22
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Glencoe, Illinois
    Posts
    1,623

    Default

    X-Band Detection-Winner=V1
    K-Band Detection-Winner=V1
    Ka-Band Detection-Winner=RX-65
    Laser Detection-Winner=V1
    Voulme-Winner=V1
    Rear Detection-Winner=V1
    Durability-Winner=V1
    Price-Winner=RX65

    Am i Wrong??

  3. #23
    Power User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Southlake, TX
    Posts
    4,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ryansandlin
    Problem with your math:

    A car travelling at 55mph is travelling @ 242 feet per second, not 80.

    55miles travelled in an hour * 5280 feet in a mile = 290400 feet travelled in an hour / 1200 seconds in an hour = 242 feet per second.
    actually Jamal is right.............because there are 3600 seconds per hour, 60 sec/min X 60 min/hr so thus 60x60 is 3600

    so 55MPH IS infact 80.6666 FPS

  4. #24
    Power User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Southlake, TX
    Posts
    4,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by richardboy316
    X-Band Detection-Winner=V1
    K-Band Detection-Winner=V1
    Ka-Band Detection-Winner=RX-65
    Laser Detection-Winner=V1
    Voulme-Winner=V1
    Rear Detection-Winner=V1
    Durability-Winner=V1
    Price-Winner=RX65

    Am i Wrong??
    Price-Winner = X50 RED actually

    dont mind me just being the usual smarta$$

  5. #25
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Southeast Texas
    Posts
    399

    Default

    ahh!!!!! he IS right!

    Wow... it's been 3 years since college algebra- I was thinking there were 1200 secs in a minute... I feel incredibly stupid

  6. #26
    Power User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,939

    Default

    The guy said he got 3 second earlier warning going 55mph before the V1 alerted.

    Go to onlineconversion.com and you will see:
    55 mile/hour = 80.666 666 667 foot/second

    The guy said 3 seconds at 55mph so you multiple 80.666666667 times 3 and it = 242 feet. This calculates the difference in distance between the 2 detectors according to the poster.

    83 mile/hour = 121.733 333 333 foot/second. So this means it takes about 2 seconds to go 242 feet at 83mph. Since the RX65 beat the V1 by 242 feet the V1 would alert 2 seconds after the RX65 if he had been travelling 83 mph because that would be 242 feet.

  7. #27
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    593

    Default

    Sheesh. Touchy crowd.

    I don't know how much wider the margin could get than umpteen to zip but anyway I've already said I'm prepared to back down to "remorselessly crushed" Can't say fairer than that.

    It kind of seems stupid to be arguing over the merits of a detector I own with someone who's been expecting theirs in two days max for about a week but here goes.

    Just about any detector on the market, even the lowliest Cobra, will give you adequate protection on X and K band. The problems are Ka and Laser. You've already acknowledged that the V1 lacks a little something in this area (Ka) and if you had Multanovas you'd be even more worried.

    So that leaves Laser. The V1 has it's laser abilities trumpeted endlessly but I would contend that if you relied on the V1 to save you... well you'd be one sorry little fella. What you're looking for with laser is scatter, if it's a real hit you're toast. So what percentage of the V1's laser alerts are from scatter as compared to real alerts and falses. From my experience it's around 5% and if I'm being generous I'd give you 45% real hits and 55% falses(when I asked this question of other people I got a range from 80% falses to 95% falses but like I said I'm being generous). So if you slam on the brakes every time you get a laser alert on the V1 45% of the time you're dead anyway 5% of the time you may be saved and 55% of the time you'll look like a cretin. That may be how you organise your life but it's not good enough for me.

    So you buy a jammer and Veil and Lasershield.

    And switch off the V1's laser alert and enjoy your drive.

    Even better, you put the V1 in a drawer and use it for backup.

    And buy a detector that's really good on Ka...

    Now I wonder what that could be. :twisted:

  8. #28
    Professional
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,160

    Default

    I agree with carbonhed on one thing I didn't mean to have such a heated debate over the seconds into mileage (feet) But it is nice to know the specifics when you get to be professional and detailed with RD's. Anyways, I feel that both detectors would have given me just enough time to slow down if I was going say 65. I might be going over even with that. It would be pretty obvious with a front dip and a back rise. When I do come into such a case I will shift into the lowest gear possible without crashing, lightly tap the brakes to aviod the dip, and pull ever so lightly on the emergency brake to get me back down when I am in a rush to get somewhere. Normally I don't speed only when I need to get to the post office before it closes at 5 P.M. :wink: But seriously, I normally don't because I just like having something that makes me happy and drives my family nuts with all the beep'n and brap'n and brap brap'n!

    Ace_Racer

  9. #29
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    660

    Default

    I've tested my RX65 vs my V1 and I am not so sure the Bel wins even on Ka. On all other bands the V1 beats the Bel and I have video posted to prove this.

    However, to be fair I don't have any video of the Bel vs the V1 on Ka. I hope to find some LEO's soon that are running Ka, so I can get some real world tests. I have a feeling it is going to be very close.

    Bottom line is, they are both really good RD's, so use the one that fits your needs the best. Either way you won't go wrong!

    CC

  10. #30
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bay City, Michigan
    Posts
    2,204

    Default

    Ace, I know you aren't really a n00b around here which is why I am going to ask. . .

    Did you run both detectors at the same time??

    Other than that - great testing. :-D

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. RX65 vs V995. RX65 discontinued, but V995 remains
    By marksand in forum Beltronics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-17-2012, 05:29 PM
  2. RX65 Blue vs Refurb S7 RX65
    By ksujedi in forum Beltronics
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-12-2011, 07:48 PM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-31-2006, 06:44 PM
  4. X50 and RX65
    By Radar 4 Ever in forum Escort
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-27-2006, 09:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •