|
|
if you would read the previous posts before posting jazzy, you would see he clearly stated he wasn't running both at the same time.
which makes your post completely void and unnecessary.
i love it how people are so quick to try to discredit someone's test.
Listen to the way he worded his testing. How did he know that the RX65 alerted seconds before the V1 if they were not running at the same time.
"Everytime the RX65 alerted seconds before the V1 did."
"The RX65 alerted first (by about 2-3 seconds) but as soon as I passed it drop it."
"Still the RX65 alerted slightly first then the V1, but the V1 stayed on for .2 after I passed only because after you passed you went around the bend."
It sounds exactly like he was running them at the same time but he is saying they were not running at the same time so people would not discredit his testing.
I kinda have to agree with Jazzy...That was the first thing that popped into my head when reading his post. That is why I did not comment on it...It seemed safe to say to me that he was running both at the same time based on time differences.
It sucks to hear this but a lot of people on here post fake testing results for reasons unknown. Not saying this one is fake but it is just a fact of this forum....and normally I will be the 1st person to let a new guy know his testing is worthless but I was sick of the drama
Thanks for the support Aaseavey! It is nice for somebody to call it as they see it too.
people need to read through all the responses before posting. that way, we can avoid the same crap being said over and over, which is very annoying, such as when a 2nd person felt the need to correct my math mistake. if you would've read through the discussion, you would see that he stated a few times he didn't run them together.
anyway.
x2Originally Posted by <<JAZZY>>
And if you would have read all the posts what we are saying is it is not possible to give time differences when running the 2 detectors seperate.
So what we are saying: pretty good chances the guy ran them together but gave his results saying he ran them seperate so no one would discredit him just as Jazzy said
i'm going with ace racer on this one. he has been a very respectable and non-biased member of this forum, unlike others.
i'm surprised you aren't taking his side as much as you hate the v1.
Where did I ever say I hated the V1? :roll: I have said the V1 is not as good at picking up Ka band over hills and around corners then the others....but I have never said I hate the V1...I just don't love it and treat it like gold like you do
I just don't agree with someone's report because their results are what I am looking for. :roll: Although that is what many do. Anyway...let it go...this conversation is over. You agree with the report others don't...GOT IT...
and its entirely possible to give time different. you travel at the same speed to the same point, start a stopwatch when each alerts, stop when you reach it. you can throw in the distance factor to figure the time out.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks