Page 18 of 19 FirstFirst ... 816171819 LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 187
  1. #171
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    2,816

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ES13Raven
    Quote Originally Posted by jimbonzzz
    My reasoning used to be that "the K-Band bandpass is only 200 MHz wide normally, and nobody seems to be worried about missing out of tune K-Band radar". But that was before I knew about the 34.94 Stalkers...
    Honestly, how common are they? There weren't many sold right?
    How lucky do you feel? :wink:

    GTO_04

  2. #172
    Power User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,939

    Default

    I know some people sent RX65's to Michael B to be tested. Are the RX65 numbers going to be added to the results?

  3. #173
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    540

    Default

    Whats the deal with the X50? Is that going to be tested?

  4. #174
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Baltimore City
    Posts
    528

    Default

    Why doesn't someonejust make there rd as sensitive as aircraft radar.Im sure there sensitivity is something ungodly like650 dbs. Lets detect police radar120 miles away..

  5. #175
    Experienced
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    200

    Default

    It'd be just a little obvious with an AWACs style rotating radome installed on the top of your car :P

    Hope you've got big enough of an alternator to power the radar :P

  6. #176
    Power User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MI / MA
    Posts
    3,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stealth 795
    Why doesn't someonejust make there rd as sensitive as aircraft radar.Im sure there sensitivity is something ungodly like650 dbs. Lets detect police radar120 miles away..
    I'd rather not have a Walgreens locator for the next county?

  7. #177
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    540

    Default

    Anybody have any updates on when this test is going to be completed?

  8. #178
    Professional
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,483

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wanderingmind
    Anybody have any updates on when this test is going to be completed?

    It is completed just go to page 2 and scroll down and the graph are at the bottom of the page.

  9. #179
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hookem202
    Quote Originally Posted by wanderingmind
    Anybody have any updates on when this test is going to be completed?

    It is completed just go to page 2 and scroll down and the graph are at the bottom of the page.
    Actually, it is not. The X50 (GOL) is missing.

  10. #180
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    TX USA
    Posts
    116

    Default

    I personally would not include many-years-old V1 models in the averages, as all the other detector's averages include recent samples only. The V1 REALLY kicks butt when you throw out the 1.7 and 1-2 numbers.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Mike B's Sensitity Testing / WE need a UPdated test ! :)
    By Mandingo in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-13-2012, 04:15 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •