Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 54
  1. #11
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Southern MA
    Posts
    10,127

    Default

    I love how the test was a bit biased tgo BELscort in the False testing.

    The X50 was using the Cheetah system? Why wasn't the V1 using a cheetah system as well?

    Spoiler: show

    Radar Detectors-V1 & BEL v995
    Laser Jammer-Laser Interceptor Quad
    GPS Camera Locator-Cheetah C100
    GPS Nav-Garmin nuvi w/Trapster
    CB Radio-Galaxy DX-949 w/Wilson 500
    Scanner-RS Pro-96

  2. #12
    Scratonicity Groupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,614

    Default

    the x50 was not officially tested all weekend. the only belscorts officially tested where the STi & 9500i. that was Roy's x50 that was tested with the Cheetah. I think it was to just show off the cheetah mirror and not the x50.

    The sad thing is Cobra got to test the V1 most of the weekend and after I instructed them several times on how to disable X or K I'm sure they didn't figure it out.

    I did the first round of testing with the v1 on the false course then they took it away from me because I was "doing it wrong"...

    So take those results with a grain of salt.

  3. #13
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Shreveport, LA
    Posts
    783

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thestaton
    guys be very scared of Q3. in a 8 or 9 car caravan I was the last car and Q3 car was 2nd. for 12 straight miles I got X & K falses from them.

    there detectors are some of the poorest made I have ever got to use. and i'm 95% sure they use the same antennas as RMR.

    and good god they leak sooooooooo bad.
    Hah. The Q3 SBIII is the old PNI Sensoro Silver Bullet in a different colored case! Odd thing is I went to the Q3 online store and the stuff they sell is exactly like the stuff PNI "innovates." I thought PNI actually did r&d (for their other products besides detectors) and not just rebrand Chinese imports....

    Ah well, at least I got my Silver Bullet for $30 and not the $150 that Q3 wants for the "SBIII." :shock:

  4. #14
    Professional
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The Socialist People's Republic of California
    Posts
    1,190

    Default

    Whats with the BS on the long range test.

    I highly doubt that all of the detectors are equal on range.

    lol, such bs.....................

  5. #15
    Professional
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The Socialist People's Republic of California
    Posts
    1,190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bkrell
    Quote Originally Posted by thestaton
    guys be very scared of Q3. in a 8 or 9 car caravan I was the last car and Q3 car was 2nd. for 12 straight miles I got X & K falses from them.

    there detectors are some of the poorest made I have ever got to use. and i'm 95% sure they use the same antennas as RMR.

    and good god they leak sooooooooo bad.
    Hah. The Q3 SBIII is the old PNI Sensoro Silver Bullet in a different colored case! Odd thing is I went to the Q3 online store and the stuff they sell is exactly like the stuff PNI "innovates." I thought PNI actually did r&d (for their other products besides detectors) and not just rebrand Chinese imports....

    Ah well, at least I got my Silver Bullet for $30 and not the $150 that Q3 wants for the "SBIII." :shock:
    You got screwed either way.

    Those are in what we call the "Pos" league...............

  6. #16
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    On the Couch
    Posts
    760

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phillip559
    Whats with the BS on the long range test.

    I highly doubt that all of the detectors are equal on range.

    lol, such bs.....................
    It's all a white lie to generate revenue
    The FTC no longer protects the consumer.

    Since when has anyone been able to get the EPA highway or city mileage as indictated on their window sticker?

    Have you seen GMRS radio ads lately? 20+ mile range with UHF and a rubber duck, I think not!! They dont list the power output like 1/2 watt 2 watts etc but some range figure that no one will ever get unless you are on a freaking boat!

    Is this the road we are going down now for detector testing?

    Look, for detectors, all we need is sensitivity numbers and filtering spec ratings instead of unrealistic tests.

    yep, quite sure its the money factor. Cant offend the sponsors
    <<--- Valentine One v3.861 --->>
    Protecting a Hemi Challenger
    Saves = 200+ -- Pharmacies Detected=9733

  7. #17
    Scratonicity Groupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,614

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phillip559
    Whats with the BS on the long range test.

    I highly doubt that all of the detectors are equal on range.

    lol, such bs.....................
    it's a marketing ploy. that 9 miles was weird but those results are how it went down. I tested the Q3 and oh my god. starting at 9 miles and then driving for 5 solid miles until you get an alert god what a waste of time.

    the 9 miles does not represent any sort of real world situation for 99% of America. However for that area it's just that radar travels really well...

    Hell there was an officer running 35.5 and he was who knows where and we kept picking up his instant on.

  8. #18
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    184

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phillip559
    Whats with the BS on the long range test.

    I highly doubt that all of the detectors are equal on range.

    lol, such bs.....................
    9 miles is the limit of their test course

  9. #19
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Shreveport, LA
    Posts
    783

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phillip559

    You got screwed either way.

    Those are in what we call the "Pos" league...............
    You're KIDDING?

    Well aware, just as I was when I bought it. Just pointing out the pedigree of the Q3 products. :wink:

  10. #20
    Scratonicity Groupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,614

    Default

    oh I forgot to mention. Q3 bought PNI...

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. As usual the SML results are a joke!
    By bigalinwv in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 08-16-2008, 12:30 PM
  2. Results from Aug. 17th RD Test Inconsistent with the Results from the Off-Axis Test?
    By ZJamaican in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-16-2008, 10:30 AM
  3. NO JOKE!!!!!
    By Jammer84_03 in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-22-2008, 02:47 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •