Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 54 of 54
  1. #51
    Scratonicity Groupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,614

    Default

    they did both. but here is why the alerted. something was obviously wrong some where. the pop guns where not getting speeds until 350FT. The STi alerted to 16MS one time and I was in utter shock.

    who knows.

    they did the pop test kind of like a laser jammer test.

    1000FT Cone & 500FT cone then you drive forward until the gun gets your speed or you get the alert first.

  2. #52
    Power User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MI / MA
    Posts
    3,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thestaton
    they did both. but here is why the alerted. something was obviously wrong some where. the pop guns where not getting speeds until 350FT. The STi alerted to 16MS one time and I was in utter shock.

    who knows.

    they did the pop test kind of like a laser jammer test.

    1000FT Cone & 500FT cone then you drive forward until the gun gets your speed or you get the alert first.
    That sounds like a gun malfunction...

  3. #53
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    My Home
    Posts
    3,169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimbonzzz
    Quote Originally Posted by Azonehits
    One thing that really struck me was the POP test results in K band - correct me if i'm wrong here thestaton. According to them, they used the Z25 or Z35 and a lot of RD's detected it which i believe is not true. Has anyone noticed the POP test results?
    I noticed that Azone, and you're right! And, this is the third year now that SML reported a bunch of detector alerting to 16ms POP :roll:
    So either 1) the gun's weren't actually in POP mode, or 2) they held the trigger too long.
    It's surprising to see that after 3 years, they should have known how to use the Z25/35 properly.

  4. #54
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    On the Couch
    Posts
    760

    Default

    Did they at least use the same test vehicle so there would be no difference in glass and reflections?
    <<--- Valentine One v3.861 --->>
    Protecting a Hemi Challenger
    Saves = 200+ -- Pharmacies Detected=9733

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. As usual the SML results are a joke!
    By bigalinwv in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 08-16-2008, 12:30 PM
  2. Results from Aug. 17th RD Test Inconsistent with the Results from the Off-Axis Test?
    By ZJamaican in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-16-2008, 10:30 AM
  3. NO JOKE!!!!!
    By Jammer84_03 in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-22-2008, 02:47 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •