Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jdong
    ...Now, it's just the Cobra -- why did one test run get 1/3 of the distance? (I would think it's a software fault of the filtering algorithm, not test condition approach)
    Probably because the Cobra initially thought that it was filtering out another Cobra!

    Seriously though, that could more or less be what happened?

  2. #12
    Power User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MI / MA
    Posts
    3,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MEM-TEK
    Quote Originally Posted by jdong
    ...Now, it's just the Cobra -- why did one test run get 1/3 of the distance? (I would think it's a software fault of the filtering algorithm, not test condition approach)
    Probably because the Cobra initially thought that it was filtering out another Cobra!

    Seriously though, that could more or less be what happened?
    Yeah, my prime suspect would be overzealous filtering. It's a shame though -- from most of the tests it seemed like the actual sensitivity of the Cobras when they worked is enough to get by, but the fact that they don't work with any certainty makes it an unsuitable detector for anyone.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Ka band variation
    By verymanywelps in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-24-2011, 06:17 PM
  2. Same model sensitivity variation
    By Public Enemy No 1 in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-10-2006, 02:54 AM
  3. NYC: New Variation on an Old Trap
    By speedneed2 in forum Local & Regional Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-05-2006, 10:53 PM
  4. Consistency of Veil?
    By brick in forum Laser Veil Stealth Coating
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-06-2005, 03:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •