Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 39

Thread: Warning

  1. #1
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Morristown, Arizona, United States
    Posts
    3,300

    Default Warning

    We have been notified of a user posting source code for the "Radar Detector Tools" program that violates Escorts EULA agreement and copywrite infringement.

    This is not a "hacking forum" and these type of postings are not allowed. Anyone that posts such messages will be banned from the forum.
    RadarBusters.com
    Motorcycle Mounts and Accessories
    Also Join me at -
    Twitter: RadarRoy
    Facebook: Roy Reyer

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    9,496

    Default

    That’s a big NO, NO. its good to share info but some things are just supposed to be private.

  3. #3
    Street Lawyer
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    719, Colorado
    Posts
    7,108

    Default Re: Warning

    Man I already warned that kid about DMCA

  4. #4
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    on the highways
    Posts
    2,328

    Default Re: Warning

    That should not be posted here..

  5. #5
    Professional
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    On your six, get outta my way!
    Posts
    1,101

    Default Re: Warning

    Is there a way that you can force new users to read and agree to all the rules before they are allowed to post. I don't mean a single check mark for all the rules, but an individual check mark for each rule.

    Also maybe something that forces them to see the links to some of the more important stickies, like the "which detector should I get?" question that we see every other day. it might cut down on all the repetitive posts.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Warning

    Hi everyone,

    I totally agree! A good while back I had a long customer service chat with one of Escort's reps. This was a major concern for both me and Escort since I realized the importance and gravity of the possibility that Bel/Escort's very highly proprietary firmware could be deciphered and publicly disclosed. Here is the deal:

    -- Radar detector firmware for all radar detector manufacturers is very highly proprietary stuff. At least half of a radar detector's performance characteristics is based on the firmware.

    -- The RD firmware presently is flashed into chips which encrypt the data and prevent the possibility of reading out the firmware unless a special access code is used. This has proven to be a safe technology for the radar detector manufacturers to use.

    -- The question arose regarding how Escort can safely transfer new firmware code from Escort, into an Escort product owner's computer, and then into the radar detector while assuring that the firmware code wouldn't be intercepted or hacked. I had no answer since I am not an expert software programmer.

    I don't know how Escort resolved these issues, but obviously they implemented steps to hopefully assure that any firmware flashes only get downloaded by the user just once without requiring contacting Escort if there was a problem, and that Escort keeps careful track of users who download and flash updates to their radar detector products.

    So, basically, the mere fact that the 9500ci and 9500ix radar detectors can be updated via the Internet is a blessing which must not be abused or this feature will be gone in a heartbeat.

    I highly recommend that all of us be very diligent in reporting any hackers who try to disclose any of Bel/Escort firmware or who try hack attempts to either get the firmware or hack Escort's software update program. This is the only way that we can be reasonably assured that Escort can and will continue to provide Internet upgrade capabilities in the future.
    We at present have a darned good thing regarding the ability to update our 9500ix and 9500ci radar detector products. Any expert programmers and hackers who find security issues, I am sure that Escort would love to hear from you as long as you do not publicly disclose your findings.


  7. #7
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    14,448

    Default Re: Warning

    Not that I disagree or anything, but it's interesting to see people at a forum devoted solely to the purpose of illegal activity and "sticking it to the man" draw the line at proprietary hacking.

    "Buy the BEST and screw the rest." - fire65

    "im intrested to see how well you do.i never seen a car JTG before would be a first for me.." - radarrob

  8. #8

    Default Re: Warning

    Quote Originally Posted by Stealth Stalker View Post
    Not that I disagree or anything, but it's interesting to see people at a forum devoted solely to the purpose of illegal activity and "sticking it to the man" draw the line at proprietary hacking.
    I would hardly say that this forum is devoted solely to the purpose of illegal activity of any kind. I use my radar detectors for driving entertainment and to keep me much more aware of my driving habits. Yet I hate hackers and cyber-thieves with a passion.

  9. #9
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,795

    Default Re: Warning

    I don't use it totally for illegal activities, and if caught I only hurt myself. Hacking is a crime against others. Still a hanging offense in Oklahoma. lol

  10. #10
    Street Lawyer
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    719, Colorado
    Posts
    7,108

    Default Re: Warning

    Quote Originally Posted by MEM-TEK View Post
    I would hardly say that this forum is devoted solely to the purpose of illegal activity of any kind. I use my radar detectors for driving entertainment and to keep me much more aware of my driving habits. Yet I hate hackers and cyber-thieves with a passion.

    Hackers aren't bad, in fact a lot of us have the same perspectives as RD users. Obviously Escort has to make money, but open source software for the 9500ci wouldn't be too bad, the community could contribute their own database and upgrade patches, and that's not necessarily a bad thing. I agree posting the source of Escort's own software was entirely irresponsible, but to a hacker, looking at the source yourself and building upon it to make something better is really probably all the poster was trying to achieve, not subscription fraud or anything.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. sti and low warning for ka
    By mikie2084 in forum Beltronics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-19-2010, 05:17 PM
  2. Radar Warning and Laser Warning Sound different right?
    By ThE_JOkeR in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-20-2008, 01:13 AM
  3. WARNING DO NOT BUY FROM BEST BUY
    By DOUG in forum Escort
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-14-2006, 03:31 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •